Skip to content

Conversation

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member

@jaikiran jaikiran commented Jun 30, 2025

Can I please get a review of this test-only change which addresses the issue noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8359337?

On macOS, the JDK by default (without any explicit system properties) picks up the proxy settings configured on the host. These proxy settings then get used by the JVM wide DefaultProxySelector. That can then result in some tests, like the ones listed in that issue, to fail.

The commit in this PR updates these tests to disable the proxy when running these tests. I've verified that after these changes, these tests now pass on the host where these tests were failing previously. Additionally I've run tier2 to make sure nothing else is impacted due to this change.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8359337: XML/JAXP tests that make network connections should ensure that no proxy is selected (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26052/head:pull/26052
$ git checkout pull/26052

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26052
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26052/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26052

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26052

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26052.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 30, 2025

👋 Welcome back jpai! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 30, 2025

@jaikiran This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8359337: XML/JAXP tests that make network connections should ensure that no proxy is selected

Reviewed-by: lancea, iris, joehw

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • aa19111: 8360867: CTW: Disable inline cache verification
  • 00adbbe: 8274051: Remove supports_vtime()/elapsedVTime()

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 30, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 30, 2025

@jaikiran The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 30, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 30, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@JoeWang-Java JoeWang-Java left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Jaikiran. nit: may add the bug id (8359337) to the @bug tag.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@LanceAndersen LanceAndersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the assist with this Jai

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you Joe and Lance for the reviews. I've updated the tests to include the bug id as suggested by Joe. I'll integrate this tomorrow.

@jdlib
Copy link

jdlib commented Jun 30, 2025

What is the error seen on macOS when the proxy is not disabled?

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member Author

jaikiran commented Jul 1, 2025

Hello Johannes,

What is the error seen on macOS when the proxy is not disabled?

These tests have been written to trigger specific error conditions. Some of them rely on a specific exception being thrown when communicating with an address that is known to be invalid. When a proxy is involved, the communication with the target address happens over the proxy which results in a different error (which depends on the proxy implementation). That causes the assertions in these tests to fail.

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member Author

jaikiran commented Jul 1, 2025

Thank you all for the reviews. I'll go ahead and integrate this now.

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member Author

jaikiran commented Jul 1, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Going to push as commit 7583a7b.
Since your change was applied there have been 14 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 1, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 1, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 1, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 1, 2025

@jaikiran Pushed as commit 7583a7b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jaikiran jaikiran deleted the 8359337 branch July 1, 2025 11:40
@jaikiran
Copy link
Member Author

jaikiran commented Jul 1, 2025

/backport :jdk25

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 1, 2025

@jaikiran the backport was successfully created on the branch backport-jaikiran-7583a7b8-jdk25 in my personal fork of openjdk/jdk. To create a pull request with this backport targeting openjdk/jdk:jdk25, just click the following link:

➡️ Create pull request

The title of the pull request is automatically filled in correctly and below you find a suggestion for the pull request body:

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit 7583a7b8 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Jaikiran Pai on 1 Jul 2025 and was reviewed by Lance Andersen, Iris Clark and Joe Wang.

Thanks!

If you need to update the source branch of the pull then run the following commands in a local clone of your personal fork of openjdk/jdk:

$ git fetch https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk.git backport-jaikiran-7583a7b8-jdk25:backport-jaikiran-7583a7b8-jdk25
$ git checkout backport-jaikiran-7583a7b8-jdk25
# make changes
$ git add paths/to/changed/files
$ git commit --message 'Describe additional changes made'
$ git push https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk.git backport-jaikiran-7583a7b8-jdk25

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants