-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8361102: java.lang.classfile.CodeBuilder.branch(Opcode op, Label target) doesn't throw IllegalArgumentException - if op is not of Opcode.Kind.BRANCH #26229
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…et) doesn't throw IllegalArgumentException - if op is not of Opcode.Kind.BRANCH
|
👋 Welcome back liach! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@liach This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 26 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
| cases.sort(new Comparator<>() { | ||
| @Override | ||
| public int compare(SwitchCase c1, SwitchCase c2) { | ||
| return Integer.compare(c1.caseValue(), c2.caseValue()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
isn this an implicit null check?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but this doesn't run when the list has just one element of null - see case https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/26229/files#diff-cb987200ae23ff7522bd692d4707a012b115bf778a1265ba11db0b3bf5c9aa7cR98
asotona
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
|
Thanks for the reviews! /integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 3f59eae.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Currently, DirectCodeBuilder is erroneously missing argument checks for a few of its override methods that take arguments such as Opcode and the array size for multianewarray and the switches, which would write something before throwing an exception. We correct these problems and verify with some tests.
Note: Other Label-writing methods resolve their label eagerly so they are not (yet) problematic.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26229/head:pull/26229$ git checkout pull/26229Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26229$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26229/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26229View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26229Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26229.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment