8361447: [REDO] Checked version of JNI Release<type>ArrayElements needs to filter out known wrapped arrays#26234
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back dholmes! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@dholmes-ora This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
|
@dholmes-ora The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
… cause disk full errors Reviewed-by: jpai, darcy
|
/issue add 8361754 |
|
@dholmes-ora |
coleenp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok, makes sense to backport both together.
|
Thanks @coleenp ! /integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 9adc480.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@dholmes-ora Pushed as commit 9adc480. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit f67e4354 from the openjdk/jdk repository.
The commit being backported was authored by David Holmes on 10 Jul 2025 and was reviewed by Martin Doerr, Thomas Stuefe and Coleen Phillimore.
There is a follow up fix to the test - JDK-8361754 - that has been incorporated into this PR
Thanks!
Progress
Issues
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26234/head:pull/26234$ git checkout pull/26234Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26234$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26234/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26234View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26234Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26234.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment