Skip to content

Conversation

@prrace
Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace commented Jul 15, 2025

Remove a finalize() method in CGraphicsEnvironment, replacing it with Disposer.

I don't see a way to add a test to verify this clean up.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8362291: [macOS] Remove finalize method in CGraphicsEnvironment.java (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26332/head:pull/26332
$ git checkout pull/26332

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26332
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26332/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26332

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26332

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26332.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 15, 2025

👋 Welcome back prr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 15, 2025

@prrace This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8362291: [macOS] Remove finalize method in CGraphicsEnvironment.java

Reviewed-by: bchristi, serb, kizune

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 59 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8362291 8362291: [macOS] Remove finalize method in CGraphicsEnvironment.java Jul 15, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 15, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 15, 2025

@prrace The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 15, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Webrevs

try {
deregisterDisplayReconfiguration(displayReconfigContext);
} catch (Throwable t) {
// Runs on disposer thread, can't allow an exception to escape.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you think about moving this "catch Throwable" into Disposer itself? As of now since #9890 we ignore "Exception" only.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can do that. I can't think of a problem with it.
I should probably then do the same for the other catches of Exception in that file.

I'm a bit on the fence about whether I should

  1. keep the print statements there
  2. remove them
  3. hide them behind a debugging option

I think I'll leave them alone and if we need to we can adjust in another PR.

super.finalize();
} finally {
private static class CGEDisposerRecord implements DisposerRecord {
private long displayReconfigContext;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

displayReconfigContext should be final

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 17, 2025
@prrace
Copy link
Contributor Author

prrace commented Jul 21, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Going to push as commit 523993e.
Since your change was applied there have been 79 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 21, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 21, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 21, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 21, 2025

@prrace Pushed as commit 523993e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants