Skip to content

Conversation

@caspernorrbin
Copy link
Member

@caspernorrbin caspernorrbin commented Sep 4, 2025

#26981 introduced the possibility to supply the red-black tree with a custom verifier, however the call to this verifier was inside an assert, meaning it wasn't called for all builds. This results in two gtests failing.

This fix moves the call outside the assert, and then checks the result instead.

Testing:

  • Local gtest testing
  • Oracle tier 1

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8366897: RBTreeTest.IntrusiveCustomVerifyTest and RBTreeTest.CustomVerify tests fail on non-debug builds (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27097/head:pull/27097
$ git checkout pull/27097

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27097
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27097/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27097

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27097

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27097.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 4, 2025

👋 Welcome back cnorrbin! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 4, 2025

@caspernorrbin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8366897: RBTreeTest.IntrusiveCustomVerifyTest and RBTreeTest.CustomVerify tests fail on non-debug builds

Reviewed-by: ayang

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 4, 2025

@caspernorrbin The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 4, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Webrevs

@caspernorrbin caspernorrbin changed the title 8366897: RBTreeTest.IntrusiveTest and RBTreeTest.CustomVerify tests fail on non-debug builds 8366897: RBTreeTest.IntrusiveCustomVerifyTest and RBTreeTest.CustomVerify tests fail on non-debug builds Sep 4, 2025
Copy link
Member

@albertnetymk albertnetymk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since extra_verifier may have side-effect, it must be invoked outside the assert macro.

How about assert(verifier(... a few below? Does that require similar fixup?

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 4, 2025
@caspernorrbin
Copy link
Member Author

How about assert(verifier(... a few below? Does that require similar fixup?

That is the internal self-defined verifier that compares nodes, defined in verify_self. It has no side effect, and is strictly used for node comparisons.

@albertnetymk
Copy link
Member

It has no side effect, and is strictly used for node comparisons.

I see; seems a bit fragile though -- it's not obvious that this closure must be side-effect free.

Anyway, this fix is trivial enough; feel free to merge to reduce CI noise.

@caspernorrbin
Copy link
Member Author

I see; seems a bit fragile though -- it's not obvious that this closure must be side-effect free.

I can understand that. But seeing as it's a one-line lambda in the function calling verify, I think it's mostly fine. Thanks for reviewing.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Going to push as commit 945aaf8.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 4, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 4, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 4, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 4, 2025

@caspernorrbin Pushed as commit 945aaf8.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@caspernorrbin caspernorrbin deleted the rbtree-verifier-fix branch September 23, 2025 08:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants