Skip to content

Conversation

@david-beaumont
Copy link
Contributor

@david-beaumont david-beaumont commented Sep 9, 2025

The writer field of the handler needs to be re-checked for null inside the locked region before use.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8365483: Test sun/rmi/runtime/Log/6409194/NoConsoleOutput.java sometimes fails (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27173/head:pull/27173
$ git checkout pull/27173

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27173
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27173/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27173

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27173

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27173.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 9, 2025

👋 Welcome back david-beaumont! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Please run tier 2 before integrating.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 9, 2025

@david-beaumont This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8365483: Test sun/rmi/runtime/Log/6409194/NoConsoleOutput.java sometimes fails

Reviewed-by: dfuchs, jpai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 15 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@dfuch, @jaikiran) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 9, 2025

@david-beaumont The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 9, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 9, 2025
Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding that test @david-beaumont ! The license header needs to be fixed though.

return null;
}
}
} No newline at end of file
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix newlines at the end.

Comment on lines 5 to 9
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation. Oracle designates this
* particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided
* by Oracle in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tests should not have the "Classpath" exception.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@david-beaumont david-beaumont Sep 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ahh thanks, didn't realize they could not just be copied from source files.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 9, 2025
@david-beaumont
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 9, 2025

@david-beaumont
Your change (at version 213361c) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 9, 2025
Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still LGTM. Thanks for merging with the latest master changes.

@david-beaumont
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 10, 2025

@david-beaumont
Your change (at version d174f56) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@dfuch
Copy link
Member

dfuch commented Sep 10, 2025

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 10, 2025

Going to push as commit 4d4e51c.
Since your change was applied there have been 15 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Sep 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 10, 2025

@dfuch @david-beaumont Pushed as commit 4d4e51c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants