Skip to content

8260403: javap should be more robust in the face of invalid class files #2724

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

asotona
Copy link
Member

@asotona asotona commented Feb 25, 2021

Please review javap fix to handle java.lang.IllegalStateException for classes with invalid Signature attribute.
New test (T8260403) parsing class with invalid Signature attribute (as described in the bug) is included.
Fix wraps java.lang.IllegalStateException, reports "Error: Invalid value for Signature attribute: " and continues.

Thanks,
Adam


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8260403: javap should be more robust in the face of invalid class files

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2724/head:pull/2724
$ git checkout pull/2724

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 25, 2021

👋 Welcome back asotona! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 25, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 25, 2021

@asotona The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler
  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org labels Feb 25, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 25, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vicente-romero-oracle vicente-romero-oracle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 25, 2021

@asotona This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8260403: javap should be more robust in the face of invalid class files

Reviewed-by: vromero

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 674be87: 8261203: Incorrectly escaped javadoc html with type annotations
  • 2eca17d: 8261457: test/langtools/tools/javac/T8187978 can fail if ArrayList class is modified
  • c54724d: 8257234: Add gz option to SA jmap to write a gzipped heap dump
  • aa35b42: 8261131: jcmd jmap dump should not accept gz option with no value
  • ebdc80e: 8252883: AccessDeniedException caused by delayed file deletion on Windows
  • f79c626: 8262296: Fix remaining doclint warnings in jdk.httpserver

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@vicente-romero-oracle) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 25, 2021
@asotona
Copy link
Member Author

asotona commented Feb 25, 2021

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Feb 25, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 25, 2021

@asotona
Your change (at version 7e73e70) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor

/sponsor

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 25, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 25, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 25, 2021

@jonathan-gibbons @asotona Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 674be87: 8261203: Incorrectly escaped javadoc html with type annotations
  • 2eca17d: 8261457: test/langtools/tools/javac/T8187978 can fail if ArrayList class is modified
  • c54724d: 8257234: Add gz option to SA jmap to write a gzipped heap dump
  • aa35b42: 8261131: jcmd jmap dump should not accept gz option with no value
  • ebdc80e: 8252883: AccessDeniedException caused by delayed file deletion on Windows
  • f79c626: 8262296: Fix remaining doclint warnings in jdk.httpserver

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 7d4f60b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants