-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8367728: IGV: dump node address type #27310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8367728: IGV: dump node address type #27310
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back rcastanedalo! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@robcasloz This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 78 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@robcasloz The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
marc-chevalier
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm happy.
dafedafe
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Strange that it wasn't already printed 🙂 Thanks for adding this @robcasloz! LGTM
chhagedorn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
|
Thanks for reviewing Marc, Damon, and Christian! |
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit b00e0da.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@robcasloz Pushed as commit b00e0da. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This changeset dumps the address type of each node (
Node::adr_type()), when not null, into the IGV graphs. This should improve the visibility and diagnosability of C2 type inconsistencies, see e.g. JDK-8367667.Testing
java -Xcomp -XX:PrintIdealGraphLevel=1).Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27310/head:pull/27310$ git checkout pull/27310Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27310$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27310/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27310View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27310Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27310.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment