Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8261670: Add javadoc for the XML processing limits #2732

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

JoeWang-Java
Copy link
Member

@JoeWang-Java JoeWang-Java commented Feb 25, 2021

Add the documentation for XML processing limits to module summary. The limits were previously documented in Java tutorial and guide.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8261670: Add javadoc for the XML processing limits

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2732/head:pull/2732
$ git checkout pull/2732

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 25, 2021

👋 Welcome back joehw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 25, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 25, 2021

@JoeWang-Java The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 25, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 25, 2021

Webrevs

* <td rowspan="9">Integer</td>
* <th id="Value" scope="row" style="font-weight:normal" rowspan="9">
* A positive integer. A value less than or equal to 0 indicates no limit.
* If the value is not an integer, a NumericFormatException is thrown.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it a NumberFormatException? Also, @link might be useful here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh my, the typo has been in the tutorial all this time! It's NumberFormatException indeed.

* A positive integer. A value less than or equal to 0 indicates no limit.
* If the value is not an integer, a NumericFormatException is thrown.
* </th>
* <th id="Default" scope="row" style="font-weight:normal">64000</th>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are other Default ids in other rows. Should they be distinct? Or rather needed?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, not needed. Will remove, and also look at other copy&paste-d ids.

@JoeWang-Java
Copy link
Member Author

/csr

@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Feb 25, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 25, 2021

@JoeWang-Java this pull request will not be integrated until the CSR request JDK-8262427 for issue JDK-8261670 has been approved.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 26, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 26, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@LanceAndersen LanceAndersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good Joe. Added myself as a reviewer to the CSR as well

Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks for making the changes.

Copy link
Member

@irisclark irisclark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I'm glad to see useful information from the outdated guides/tutorial being integrated into this documentation.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Mar 1, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 1, 2021

@JoeWang-Java This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8261670: Add javadoc for the XML processing limits

Reviewed-by: lancea, naoto, iris

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 30 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 353416f: 8262509: JSSE Server should check the legacy version in TLSv1.3 ClientHello
  • 642f45f: 8261839: Error creating runtime package on macos without mac-package-identifier
  • 682e120: 8262497: Delete unused utility methods in ICC_Profile class
  • 4c9adce: 8262379: Add regression test for JDK-8257746
  • 6baecf3: 8259937: guarantee(loc != NULL) failed: missing saved register with native invoker
  • c569f1d: 8262085: Hovering Metal HTML Tooltips in different windows cause IllegalArgExc on Linux
  • 75bf106: 8262028: Make InstanceKlass::implementor return InstanceKlass
  • fe8e370: 8262188: Add test to verify trace page sizes logging on Linux
  • 0a7fff4: 8261636: The test mapping in hugetlbfs_sanity_check should consider LargePageSizeInBytes
  • 702ca62: 8262185: G1: Prune collection set candidates early
  • ... and 20 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/722142ee6c811571c1a5423354c135672fd115ff...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 1, 2021
@JoeWang-Java
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks all for the review.
/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 2, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 2, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 2, 2021

@JoeWang-Java Since your change was applied there have been 34 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 85b774a: 8255859: Incorrect comments in log.hpp
  • c3eb80e: 8262500: HostName entry in VM.info should be a new line
  • 9f0f0c9: 8260933: runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails without CompactStrings
  • d339832: 8257414: Drag n Drop target area is wrong on high DPI systems
  • 353416f: 8262509: JSSE Server should check the legacy version in TLSv1.3 ClientHello
  • 642f45f: 8261839: Error creating runtime package on macos without mac-package-identifier
  • 682e120: 8262497: Delete unused utility methods in ICC_Profile class
  • 4c9adce: 8262379: Add regression test for JDK-8257746
  • 6baecf3: 8259937: guarantee(loc != NULL) failed: missing saved register with native invoker
  • c569f1d: 8262085: Hovering Metal HTML Tooltips in different windows cause IllegalArgExc on Linux
  • ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/722142ee6c811571c1a5423354c135672fd115ff...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 6635d7a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@JoeWang-Java JoeWang-Java deleted the JDK-8261670 branch March 2, 2021 19:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants