Skip to content

Conversation

@mahendrachhipa
Copy link
Member

@mahendrachhipa mahendrachhipa commented Sep 19, 2025

Refactoring following httpclient/http2 testng test to JUnit :
test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2/BadHeadersTest.java
test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2/BadPushPromiseTest.java
test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2/BasicTest.java
test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2/ConnectionFlowControlTest.java
test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2/ContinuationFrameTest.java


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8318662: Refactor some jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2 tests to JUnit (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27388/head:pull/27388
$ git checkout pull/27388

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27388
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27388/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27388

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27388

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27388.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 19, 2025

👋 Welcome back mchhipa! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 19, 2025

@mahendrachhipa This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8318662: Refactor some jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2 tests to JUnit

Reviewed-by: dfuchs

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 14 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title JDK-8318662: Refactor some jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2 tests to JUnit 8318662: Refactor some jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2 tests to JUnit Sep 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the net net-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 19, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 19, 2025

@mahendrachhipa The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • net

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 19, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 19, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vy vy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mahendrachhipa, would you mind confirming that tier1,2 pass, please?

Comment on lines 75 to 82
static SSLContext sslContext;
static Http2TestServer http2TestServer; // HTTP/2 ( h2c )
static Http2TestServer https2TestServer; // HTTP/2 ( h2 )
static String http2URI;
static String https2URI;
static String noBodyhttp2URI;
static String noBodyhttps2URI;
final static ReferenceTracker TRACKER = ReferenceTracker.INSTANCE;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These can be private.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 23, 2025

@mahendrachhipa this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout JDK-8318662
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Sep 23, 2025
Comment on lines 134 to 142
{ http2URI, false, oneContinuation },
{ https2URI, false, oneContinuation },
{ http2URI, true, oneContinuation },
{ https2URI, true, oneContinuation },
{ http2URI, true, oneContinuation },
{ https2URI, true, oneContinuation },

{ http2URI, false, byteAtATime },
{ https2URI, false, byteAtATime },
{ http2URI, true, byteAtATime },
{ https2URI, true, byteAtATime },
{http2URI, false, byteAtATime },
{https2URI, false, byteAtATime },
{http2URI, true, byteAtATime },
{https2URI, true, byteAtATime },
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mahendrachhipa, I'd advise avoiding styling changes, unless it is really necessary.

Comment on lines 137 to 150
{http2URI, false, oneContinuation},
{https2URI, false, oneContinuation},
{http2URI, true, oneContinuation},
{https2URI, true, oneContinuation},

{noBodyhttp2URI, false, twoContinuation},
{noBodyhttp2URI, true, twoContinuation},
{noBodyhttps2URI, false, twoContinuation},
{noBodyhttps2URI, true, twoContinuation},

{http2URI, false, byteAtATime},
{https2URI, false, byteAtATime},
{http2URI, true, byteAtATime},
{https2URI, true, byteAtATime},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again, I'd suggest reverting these.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Sep 24, 2025
@vy
Copy link
Contributor

vy commented Sep 24, 2025

@mahendrachhipa, would you mind confirming that all test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2/ tests still pass on all supported platforms, please?

@mahendrachhipa
Copy link
Member Author

@mahendrachhipa, would you mind confirming that all test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2/ tests still pass on all supported platforms, please?
Yes, Mach5 Job link is added in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8318662

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 24, 2025
@mahendrachhipa
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 24, 2025

Going to push as commit 7fe71a7.
Since your change was applied there have been 14 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 24, 2025

@mahendrachhipa Pushed as commit 7fe71a7.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated net net-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants