-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8262973: Verify ParCompactionManager instance in PCAdjustPointerClosure #2813
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A couple minor nits. Otherwise looks good.
#ifdef ASSERT | ||
void ParCompactionManager::verify_all_marking_stack_empty() { | ||
uint parallel_gc_threads = ParallelGCThreads; | ||
for (uint i=0; i<=parallel_gc_threads; i++) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use spaces around operators, here and line 193.
ParCompactionManager* cm = ParCompactionManager::manager_array(0); | ||
// Update the deferred objects, if any. Any compaction manager can be used. | ||
// However, since the current thread is VM thread, we use the rightful one | ||
// to keep the verification logic happy. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If using a different cm makes the verification logic unhappy, that suggests "Any compaction manager can be used" isn't exactly true. Maybe something like "In principle, any compaction manager would do. However, ..."
@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 21 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@kimbarrett, @tschatzl) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm apart from the issues Kim mentioned.
All fixed as suggested. |
Thanks for the review. /integrate |
@albertnetymk |
/sponsor |
@tschatzl This change does not need sponsoring - the author is allowed to integrate it. |
/integrate |
@albertnetymk Since your change was applied there have been 31 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 9730266. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Verify the correct ParCompactionManager instance is used by VM/GC threads and some general cleanup.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2813/head:pull/2813
$ git checkout pull/2813