Skip to content

8371503: RETAIN_IMAGE_AFTER_TEST do not work for some tests#28208

Closed
sendaoYan wants to merge 3 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
sendaoYan:jbs8371503
Closed

8371503: RETAIN_IMAGE_AFTER_TEST do not work for some tests#28208
sendaoYan wants to merge 3 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
sendaoYan:jbs8371503

Conversation

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member

@sendaoYan sendaoYan commented Nov 8, 2025

Hi all,

The DockerTestUtils.RETAIN_IMAGE_AFTER_TEST variable which read the property from "jdk.test.docker.retain.image" do not work for some of the docker tests, such as jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestDockerCpuMetrics.java, only works for some of the docker tests, such as jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestPidsLimit.java.

This PR read the DockerTestUtils.RETAIN_IMAGE_AFTER_TEST inside function removeDockerImage instead of before all the fucntion removeDockerImage. This will make all the docker tests receive the property jdk.test.docker.retain.image.

Change has been verified locally on linux-x64 by run the all touched tests.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8371503: RETAIN_IMAGE_AFTER_TEST do not work for some tests (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28208/head:pull/28208
$ git checkout pull/28208

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28208
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28208/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28208

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28208

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28208.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 8, 2025

👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 8, 2025

@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8371503: RETAIN_IMAGE_AFTER_TEST do not work for some tests

Reviewed-by: lmesnik, dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 01adf28: 8372974: Add missing @OverRide annotations in "com.sun.java.swing.plaf.gtk" package

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org labels Nov 8, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 8, 2025

@sendaoYan The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • hotspot-runtime
  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 8, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 13, 2025
@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

Looking for 2rd reviewer, since this PR touch files in hotspot directory.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 13, 2025

@sendaoYan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

Looking for 2rd reviewer, since this PR touch files in hotspot directory?

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm unclear what you mean by some of the tests not working - are you saying those tests did not check the value of RETAIN_IMAGE_AFTER_TEST? Or that they never had it passed in - in which case why not? Where does it come from.

Comment on lines +253 to +255
if(!DockerTestUtils.RETAIN_IMAGE_AFTER_TEST) {
execute(Container.ENGINE_COMMAND, "rmi", "--force", imageNameAndTag);
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-existing but indent is too big

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You also need to document the fact the property is used to make this a no-op.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-existing but indent is too big

Fixed.

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

sendaoYan commented Dec 15, 2025

RETAIN_IMAGE_AFTER_TEST

Some tests did not check the value of the RETAIN_IMAGE_AFTER_TEST variable, causing the docker image to be deleted at the end of the test run even if the -Djdk.test.docker.retain.image=true option was used when running those tests.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 15, 2025
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks - now it makes sense to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 15, 2025
@sendaoYan sendaoYan requested a review from lmesnik December 15, 2025 06:50
@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the reviews @lmesnik @dholmes-ora

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 15, 2025

Going to push as commit 34f2413.
Since your change was applied there have been 8 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 15, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 15, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 15, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 15, 2025

@sendaoYan Pushed as commit 34f2413.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@sendaoYan sendaoYan deleted the jbs8371503 branch December 15, 2025 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants