JDK-8263068: Rename safefetch.hpp to safefetch.inline.hpp

[AntonKozlov]

Please review a trivial renaming of safefetch.hpp to safefetch.inline.hpp. It is a preparation to fix for @stefank note #2200 (comment). I'm going to rename threadWXSetters.hpp to threadWXSetters.inline.hpp and threadWXSetters header is needed for safefetch inline functions implementation.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8263068: Rename safefetch.hpp to safefetch.inline.hpp

Reviewers

• Stefan Karlsson (@stefank - Reviewer)

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2844/head:pull/2844
$ git checkout pull/2844

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back akozlov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@AntonKozlov The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (1044211)

[stefank]

Looks good and can be considered trivial (only requires one reviewer). Thanks.

[openjdk]

@AntonKozlov This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8263068: Rename safefetch.hpp to safefetch.inline.hpp

Reviewed-by: stefank

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 7 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• e1cad97: 8262862: Harden tests sun/security/x509/URICertStore/ExtensionsWithLDAP.java and krb5/canonicalize/Test.java
• 2c0507e: 8261812: C2 compilation fails with assert(!had_error) failed: bad dominance
• 9755782: 8157682: @inheritdoc doesn't work with @exception
• 8c13d26: 8263050: move HtmlDocletWriter.verticalSeparator to IndexWriter
• 8d3de4b: 8262844: (fs) FileStore.supportsFileAttributeView might return false negative in case of ext3
• 75fb7cc: 8259228: Zero: rewrite (put|get)field from if-else chains to switches
• 9730266: 8262973: Verify ParCompactionManager instance in PCAdjustPointerClosure

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@stefank) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[AntonKozlov]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@AntonKozlov
Your change (at version 1044211) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[VladimirKempik]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

@VladimirKempik @AntonKozlov Since your change was applied there have been 38 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 5bfc5fd: 8263051: Modernize the code in the java.awt.color package
• 5b9b170: 8262955: Unify os::fork_and_exec() across Posix platforms
• 39b1113: 8262161: Refactor manual I/O stream copying in java.desktop to use new convenience APIs
• 4e94760: 8263135: unique_ptr should not be used for types that are not pointers
• f71b21b: 8263038: Optimize String.format for simple specifiers
• 14cfbda: 8261366: Add discussion of IEEE 754 to BigDecimal
• 414ee95: 8261462: GCM ByteBuffer decryption problems
• eb4a8af: 8260664: Phaser.arrive() memory consistency effects
• 9221540: 8213269: convert test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/memory/RunUnitTestsConcurrently to gtest
• 17853ee: 8263200: Add -XX:StressCCP to CTW
• ... and 28 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/d91550efad325b4a896b7cad4a8ed2a70405a112...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 0bc4562.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.