Skip to content

Conversation

@franz1981
Copy link
Contributor

@franz1981 franz1981 commented Nov 24, 2025

This is boosting VirtualThread allocations while using https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/25/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/Thread.Builder.OfVirtual.html#name(java.lang.String,long)

The pattern has been discovered on quarkusio/quarkus#51201 and narrowed down in franz1981/java-puzzles@5cb4216

which, on my machine (Ryzen 7950 w fixed frequency at 4.2 GHz):

Benchmark                                                                Mode  Cnt   Score   Error  Units
VarHandlePolymorphicSignatureSensitivity.rightVarHandle                  avgt   10   1.852 ± 0.007  ns/op
VarHandlePolymorphicSignatureSensitivity.rightVarHandleConcatIndy        avgt   10   9.891 ± 0.103  ns/op
VarHandlePolymorphicSignatureSensitivity.wrongVarHandle                  avgt   10  10.430 ± 0.045  ns/op
VarHandlePolymorphicSignatureSensitivity.wrongVarHandleConcatIndy        avgt   10  19.312 ± 0.619  ns/op

where the right indy shows:
image

vs the wrong one:
image


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8372410: ThreadFactory used by Thread.Builder::factory uses non-optimal VarHandle (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28475/head:pull/28475
$ git checkout pull/28475

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28475
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28475/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28475

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28475

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28475.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 24, 2025

👋 Welcome back franz1981! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 24, 2025

@franz1981 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8372410: ThreadFactory used by Thread.Builder::factory uses non-optimal VarHandle

Reviewed-by: alanb, adinn, liach

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 13 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@AlanBateman, @adinn, @liach) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 24, 2025

@franz1981 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@franz1981 franz1981 marked this pull request as ready for review November 24, 2025 13:13
@franz1981 franz1981 changed the title VarHandle wrongly uses int parameter on VirtualThread creation 8372410: VarHandle wrongly uses int parameter on VirtualThread creation Nov 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 24, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 24, 2025

Webrevs

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

AlanBateman commented Nov 24, 2025

Good find, the bug has been moved to the right place now, can you update the title on the PR to match the JBS issue?

@franz1981
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @AlanBateman

can you update the title on the PR to match the JBS issue?

where's the new one? I cannot see any reference here on Github (this is my very first contribution :) )

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

where's the new one? I cannot see any reference here on Github (this is my very first contribution :) )

Here it is:
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372410

@franz1981 franz1981 changed the title 8372410: VarHandle wrongly uses int parameter on VirtualThread creation 8372410: ThreadFactory used by Thread.Builder::factory should use non-optimal VarHandle Nov 24, 2025
@franz1981
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done @AlanBateman thanks

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 24, 2025
@viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor

Great catch, @franz1981!

Copy link
Contributor

@adinn adinn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work!

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 24, 2025
@adinn
Copy link
Contributor

adinn commented Nov 24, 2025

@franz1981 You need to edit this PR's title so it says

  8372410: ThreadFactory used by Thread.Builder::factory uses non-optimal VarHandle

That will make it match the title of JDK-8372410.

Copy link
Member

@liach liach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not the first time this VarHandle problem is hit - see #16451

@franz1981 franz1981 changed the title 8372410: ThreadFactory used by Thread.Builder::factory should use non-optimal VarHandle 8372410: ThreadFactory used by Thread.Builder::factory uses non-optimal VarHandle Nov 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 24, 2025
@franz1981
Copy link
Contributor Author

franz1981 commented Nov 24, 2025

This has bitten me lot of times @liach 😢
Including others while reading/writing oop fields into arrays too; it would be nice to get an option to fail fast with an exception enabled via diagnostic args eg EnableStrictPolymorphicSignature
Although Javac should be able to detect it too, thinking about it twice

@JornVernee
Copy link
Member

This has bitten me lot of times @liach 😢 Including others while reading/writing oop fields into arrays too; it would be nice to get an option to fail fast with an exception enabled via diagnostic args eg EnableStrictPolymorphicSignature Although Javac should be able to detect it too, thinking about it twice

This can be done using VarHandle::withInvokeExactBehavior on a per var handle basis. C2 can constant fold the type-check away as well.

@franz1981
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JornVernee thanks 🙏 I admit it's the first time I see this method, wow

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

@franz1981 You can type "/integrate" into a comment and I will sponsor. I ran tests with the change yesterday and all good.

@SirYwell
Copy link
Member

I wonder if MhUtil.findVarHandle(...) should make VarHandles with invokeExact behavior by default, to catch such problems earlier in the JDK.

@franz1981
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Nov 25, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 25, 2025

@franz1981
Your change (at version d0ce317) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Going to push as commit 1226873.
Since your change was applied there have been 13 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 25, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 25, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Nov 25, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 25, 2025

@AlanBateman @franz1981 Pushed as commit 1226873.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants