-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8263105: security-libs doclint cleanup #2856
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back wetmore! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@bradfordwetmore The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've read the first 10 files. The edits are definitely in the right direction, and will address the "missing comments" issues.
I'll leave it up to you and the others in your team to decide what level of stylistic consistency you would like for the new comments, but just having a relevant comment at all is a great start.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/PermissionCollection.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm happy to see a reduction in the number of warnings.
I suspect there are a few places where Object{In,Out}putStream is fully qualified when it's not strictly necessary; however, since this is in pre-existing code, I don't think this needs to be changed now.
private PrivateKey privateKey; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Extra line?
@bradfordwetmore This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 61 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have recently gone through a similar exercise with java.net
: what you have here looks good to me!
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/cert/Certificate.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
/csr needed |
@bradfordwetmore the issue for this pull request, JDK-8263105, already has an approved CSR request: JDK-8263207 |
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/UnresolvedPermissionCollection.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/PrivilegedActionException.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/PrivilegedActionException.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/java.security.jgss/share/classes/javax/security/auth/kerberos/KeyImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/java.security.jgss/share/classes/javax/security/auth/kerberos/KeyImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
/integrate |
@bradfordwetmore Since your change was applied there have been 61 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 32cbd19. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Fix various things pointed out by the most recent doclint run in the security-libs area.
This is docs only: I will be checking doccheck/doclint, and will be running tier1/tier2 tests. Minor spot checks on generated files.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2856/head:pull/2856
$ git checkout pull/2856