Skip to content

8373270: GCC 14.2.0 reports warning: '%s' directive output may be truncated#28708

Closed
fmatte1 wants to merge 4 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
fmatte1:8373270
Closed

8373270: GCC 14.2.0 reports warning: '%s' directive output may be truncated#28708
fmatte1 wants to merge 4 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
fmatte1:8373270

Conversation

@fmatte1
Copy link

@fmatte1 fmatte1 commented Dec 8, 2025

8373270: GCC 14.2.0 reports warning: '%s' directive output may be truncated


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8373270: GCC 14.2.0 reports warning: '%s' directive output may be truncated (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28708/head:pull/28708
$ git checkout pull/28708

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28708
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28708/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28708

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28708

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28708.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 8, 2025

👋 Welcome back fmatte! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 8, 2025

@fmatte1 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8373270: GCC 14.2.0 reports warning: '%s' directive output may be truncated

Reviewed-by: kbarrett, dholmes, alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 32 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 8, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 8, 2025

@fmatte1 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 8, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Webrevs

if ((snprintf_result < 0) || (snprintf_result >= (int)sizeof(buffer))) {
return (0);
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not just delete this no longer used function?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Kim for looking into it, yes we can remove this, I wasn't sure why this was kept and not removed. Removing is good, as this was unused since JDK 9 times.

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member

Do we need update the copyright year.

@fmatte1
Copy link
Author

fmatte1 commented Dec 9, 2025

Do we need update the copyright year.

I am not sure, this is just a trivial cleanup change.

@kimbarrett
Copy link

Do we need update the copyright year.

I am not sure, this is just a trivial cleanup change.

I think you should update the copyright year.

Copy link

@kimbarrett kimbarrett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@fmatte1
Copy link
Author

fmatte1 commented Dec 9, 2025

Do we need update the copyright year.

I am not sure, this is just a trivial cleanup change.

I think you should update the copyright year.

I have updated the copyright year! Thanks,

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 10, 2025
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

FTR we always update the copyright year, regardless of the size of the change to the file.

Thanks

Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay, maybe consider renaming the JBS issue to make it clear that this is just removing unused code.

@fmatte1
Copy link
Author

fmatte1 commented Dec 10, 2025

@kimbarrett @dholmes-ora and @AlanBateman thanks for the reviews, I have updated the JBS issue to reflect the change.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Going to push as commit 11aa6e1.
Since your change was applied there have been 36 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@fmatte1 Pushed as commit 11aa6e1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants