Skip to content

8373295: Wrong log tag for UseCompressedOops ergo setting#28716

Closed
iklam wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
iklam:8373295-wrong-log-tag-for-UseCompressedOops-ergo-setting
Closed

8373295: Wrong log tag for UseCompressedOops ergo setting#28716
iklam wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
iklam:8373295-wrong-log-tag-for-UseCompressedOops-ergo-setting

Conversation

@iklam
Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam commented Dec 9, 2025

Please review this trivial change: Ergonomic settings of UseCompressedOops should be logged with log_debug(gc, heap, coops)

Note: this is the same log channel used just a few lines above.

if (HeapBaseMinAddress < DefaultHeapBaseMinAddress) {
// matches compressed oops printing flags
log_debug(gc, heap, coops)("HeapBaseMinAddress must be at least %zu "
"(%zuG) which is greater than value given %zu",
DefaultHeapBaseMinAddress,
DefaultHeapBaseMinAddress/G,
HeapBaseMinAddress);
FLAG_SET_ERGO(HeapBaseMinAddress, DefaultHeapBaseMinAddress);


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8373295: Wrong log tag for UseCompressedOops ergo setting (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28716/head:pull/28716
$ git checkout pull/28716

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28716
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28716/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28716

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28716

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28716.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 9, 2025

👋 Welcome back iklam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@iklam This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8373295: Wrong log tag for UseCompressedOops ergo setting

Reviewed-by: dholmes, ysuenaga

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 10 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@iklam The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 9, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Webrevs

@YaSuenag
Copy link
Member

YaSuenag commented Dec 9, 2025

I completely agree with your change!

But I received review that it should not be changed from CDS tag (I know it is aot now). See review thread in my past proposal for details: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2019-October/036315.html

I'm happy to approve if we can accept.

@dholmes-ora
Copy link
Member

The CDS logging line was put in for JDK-8226462, and as referenced by Yasumasa it was there for CDS users to be informed (or perhaps more accurately for one of our CDS tests to check it). Does that test no longer exist, or check this condition?

@iklam
Copy link
Member Author

iklam commented Dec 9, 2025

The CDS logging line was put in for JDK-8226462, and as referenced by Yasumasa it was there for CDS users to be informed (or perhaps more accurately for one of our CDS tests to check it). Does that test no longer exist, or check this condition?

This log is used only by the SysDictCras.java test .

CDS dumping requires UseCompressedClassPointers==true. In the time of JDK-8226462, when running on a host with lot of RAM, UseCompressedOops would be disabled, which causes UseCompressedClassPointers to be disabled, which caused the CDS dump to fail.

This is no longer the case -- UseCompressedClassPointers is now independent of UseCompressedOops

$ java -XX:MaxRAM=512g -XX:MaxRAMPercentage=12.5 -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal --version | grep UseCompressedClassPointers
     bool UseCompressedClassPointers   = true   {product} {default}

Also, the test is kind of pointless now. The only significant VM flags are

  • -XX:SharedBaseAddress=0: this is covered by other test cases such as test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds/ArchiveRelocationTest.java
  • -XX:MaxRAMPercentage=12.5: this might have been useful in reproducing the original crash but it's no longer relevant.

So I removed this test altogether.

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If test is no longer relevant then change seems fine.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 9, 2025
Copy link
Member

@YaSuenag YaSuenag left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for fixing this!

@iklam
Copy link
Member Author

iklam commented Dec 9, 2025

Thanks @YaSuenag @dholmes-ora for the review
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Going to push as commit 8c8d21d.
Since your change was applied there have been 19 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 9, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 9, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@iklam Pushed as commit 8c8d21d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants