Skip to content

8255463: java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/InheritedChannelTest.java failed with ThreadTimeoutException#28721

Closed
jaikiran wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
jaikiran:8255463
Closed

8255463: java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/InheritedChannelTest.java failed with ThreadTimeoutException#28721
jaikiran wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
jaikiran:8255463

Conversation

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member

@jaikiran jaikiran commented Dec 9, 2025

Can I please get a review of this test-only change which removes the testng specific timeout from a test method?

As noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8255463, the test/jdk/java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/InheritedChannelTest.java fails intermittently with:

test InheritedChannelTest.test("StateTest", java.util.ImmutableCollections$List12@d28f210): failure [30001ms]
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method InheritedChannelTest.test() didn't finish within the time-out 30000

With the proposed change in this PR, it now relies on jtreg test timeout (default of 120 seconds). If the test continues to timeout for whatever reason, then jtreg will be able to capture the relevant thread dumps of the incomplete process (launched in this test method) to help debug the issue.

The existing 30 second timeout on the test method doesn't play any role in what the test verifies, so removing it doesn't change that verification.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8255463: java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/InheritedChannelTest.java failed with ThreadTimeoutException (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28721/head:pull/28721
$ git checkout pull/28721

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28721
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28721/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28721

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28721

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28721.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

…ritedChannelTest.java failed with ThreadTimeoutException
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 9, 2025

👋 Welcome back jpai! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@jaikiran This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8255463: java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/InheritedChannelTest.java failed with ThreadTimeoutException

Reviewed-by: dfuchs, djelinski, bpb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the nio nio-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@jaikiran The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • nio

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 9, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks trivial to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 9, 2025
Copy link
Member

@bplb bplb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine.

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you all for the reviews.

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Going to push as commit a262212.
Since your change was applied there have been 11 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@jaikiran Pushed as commit a262212.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jaikiran jaikiran deleted the 8255463 branch December 10, 2025 02:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated nio nio-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants