Skip to content

7067310: 3 tests from closed/javax/sound/sampled caused BSOD on win 7 x86#28774

Closed
prrace wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
prrace:sound_pl
Closed

7067310: 3 tests from closed/javax/sound/sampled caused BSOD on win 7 x86#28774
prrace wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
prrace:sound_pl

Conversation

@prrace
Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace commented Dec 11, 2025

I am de-problem listing several sound tests.
These tests pass over and over again on all platforms when run on JDK 27 in an environment that supports sound.
I'm seeing no failures at all.
There are multiple bug IDs used to problem list these tests but only one can be the 'main' bug ID.
I've picked the oldest for that, and will "add" some of the additional issues.
In a few cases they happen to be non-public bugs for the accidental reason that someone added some internal information I can't delete, so you won't be able to see those bug ids, but there's nothing special about them and I'll close them as dups of 7067310


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issues

  • JDK-7067310: 3 tests from closed/javax/sound/sampled caused BSOD on win 7 x86 (Bug - P3)
  • JDK-8307574: ClipIsRunningAfterStop.java failed with "../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:81: __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion `mutex->__data.__owner == 0' failed." (Bug - P4)
  • JDK-8308395: javax/sound/sampled/Clip/ClipFlushCrash.java timed out (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28774/head:pull/28774
$ git checkout pull/28774

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28774
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28774/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28774

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28774

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28774.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

javax/sound/sampled/Clip/bug5070081.java 8055097 generic-all
javax/sound/sampled/DataLine/LongFramePosition.java 8055097 generic-all

javax/sound/sampled/Clip/Drain/ClipDrain.java 7062792 generic-all
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test still fails so I can't remove it from the problem list.

@prrace
Copy link
Contributor Author

prrace commented Dec 11, 2025

/label client

@prrace
Copy link
Contributor Author

prrace commented Dec 11, 2025

/issue add 8265485,8307574,8308395

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 11, 2025

👋 Welcome back prr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 11, 2025

@prrace This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

7067310: 3 tests from closed/javax/sound/sampled caused BSOD on win 7 x86
8307574: ClipIsRunningAfterStop.java failed with "../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:81: __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion `mutex->__data.__owner == 0' failed."
8308395: javax/sound/sampled/Clip/ClipFlushCrash.java timed out

Reviewed-by: serb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 7067310 7067310: 3 tests from closed/javax/sound/sampled caused BSOD on win 7 x86 Dec 11, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 11, 2025

@prrace
The client label was successfully added.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 11, 2025

@prrace The issue 8265485 was not found in the JDK project - make sure you have entered it correctly.
As there were validation problems, no additional issues will be added to the list of solved issues.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 11, 2025

@prrace To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels
  • build
  • client
  • compiler
  • core-libs
  • hotspot
  • hotspot-compiler
  • hotspot-gc
  • hotspot-jfr
  • hotspot-runtime
  • i18n
  • ide-support
  • javadoc
  • jdk
  • jmx
  • net
  • nio
  • security
  • serviceability
  • shenandoah

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 11, 2025
@prrace
Copy link
Contributor Author

prrace commented Dec 11, 2025

/issue add 8307574,8308395

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 11, 2025

@prrace
Adding additional issue to issue list: 8307574: ClipIsRunningAfterStop.java failed with "../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:81: __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion mutex->__data.__owner == 0' failed."`.

Adding additional issue to issue list: 8308395: javax/sound/sampled/Clip/ClipFlushCrash.java timed out.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 12, 2025
@prrace
Copy link
Contributor Author

prrace commented Dec 12, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Going to push as commit 9b12c0b.
Since your change was applied there have been 15 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 12, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 12, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 12, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2025

@prrace Pushed as commit 9b12c0b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants