Skip to content

8252173: Use handles instead of jobjects in modules.cpp #2878

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hseigel
Copy link
Member

@hseigel hseigel commented Mar 8, 2021

Hi,
Please review this change for JDK-8252173 to use handles instead of jobjects in modules.cpp to make modules.cpp more debuggable. The change was tested with Mach5 tiers 1 and 2 on Linux, Mac OS, and Windows, and tiers 3-5 on Linux x64.

Thanks, Harold


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8252173: Use handles instead of jobjects in modules.cpp

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2878/head:pull/2878
$ git checkout pull/2878

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 8, 2021

👋 Welcome back hseigel! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 8, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 8, 2021

@hseigel The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Mar 8, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 8, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@lfoltan lfoltan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good Harold!

Lois

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 8, 2021

@hseigel This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8252173: Use handles instead of jobjects in modules.cpp

Reviewed-by: lfoltan, coleenp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • f71b21b: 8263038: Optimize String.format for simple specifiers
  • 14cfbda: 8261366: Add discussion of IEEE 754 to BigDecimal
  • 414ee95: 8261462: GCM ByteBuffer decryption problems
  • eb4a8af: 8260664: Phaser.arrive() memory consistency effects
  • 9221540: 8213269: convert test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/memory/RunUnitTestsConcurrently to gtest
  • 17853ee: 8263200: Add -XX:StressCCP to CTW

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 8, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@hseigel
Copy link
Member Author

hseigel commented Mar 9, 2021

Thanks Lois and Coleen for reviewing this!

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 9, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 9, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 9, 2021

@hseigel Since your change was applied there have been 16 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a6e34b3: 8262829: Native crash in Win32PrintServiceLookup.getAllPrinterNames()
  • fbe40e8: 8252399: Update mapMulti documentation to use type test pattern instead of instanceof once JEP 375 exits preview
  • 0f2402d: 8263190: Update java.io, java.math, and java.text to use instanceof pattern variable
  • 4f0a12e: 8262323: do not special case JVMCI in tiered compilation policy
  • 3022baa: 8263167: IGV: build fails with "taskdef AutoUpdate cannot be found"
  • 0bc4562: 8263068: Rename safefetch.hpp to safefetch.inline.hpp
  • 5bfc5fd: 8263051: Modernize the code in the java.awt.color package
  • 5b9b170: 8262955: Unify os::fork_and_exec() across Posix platforms
  • 39b1113: 8262161: Refactor manual I/O stream copying in java.desktop to use new convenience APIs
  • 4e94760: 8263135: unique_ptr should not be used for types that are not pointers
  • ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/a2b8858131ebc2a808d6e58decb264b7aff9134d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit b7f0b3f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants