Skip to content

6562639: Wrong pixel bounds from TextLayout with white font#28809

Closed
gredler wants to merge 3 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
gredler:JDK-6562639
Closed

6562639: Wrong pixel bounds from TextLayout with white font#28809
gredler wants to merge 3 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
gredler:JDK-6562639

Conversation

@gredler
Copy link
Contributor

@gredler gredler commented Dec 13, 2025

One of the possible code paths for TextLayout.getPixelBounds(...) actually draws the text on a Graphics2D and checks the image pixels afterwards. The text is drawn over a white background, so if the user sets the font's foreground color to white then the text pixels cannot be detected (white on white).

This PR fixes the issue by removing the code that sets the background to white, leaving the background as the default ARGB color (0 = transparent black). This does not cause a new problem for users who might set their font foreground color to transparent black, because transparent font foreground colors always return an empty bounds anyway (by virtue of being transparent).

The updated code should also be slightly faster since it's doing less work, though I haven't run any performance tests.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-6562639: Wrong pixel bounds from TextLayout with white font (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28809/head:pull/28809
$ git checkout pull/28809

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28809
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28809/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28809

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28809

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28809.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 13, 2025

👋 Welcome back dgredler! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 13, 2025

@gredler This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

6562639: Wrong pixel bounds from TextLayout with white font

Reviewed-by: serb, prr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 175 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 13, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 13, 2025

@gredler The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 13, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 13, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

all our existing normal tests passed, as well as the new one.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 19, 2025
@gredler
Copy link
Contributor Author

gredler commented Dec 26, 2025

Does anyone have time to provide a second review on this PR before the end of the year? Phil has already verified that all tests pass. Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@mrserb mrserb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems the year in the header should be bumped =(

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated labels Jan 2, 2026
@gredler
Copy link
Contributor Author

gredler commented Jan 6, 2026

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2026

Going to push as commit 62181b6.
Since your change was applied there have been 201 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 6, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 6, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 6, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2026

@gredler Pushed as commit 62181b6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants