8373798: Refactor java/math tests to use JUnit#28848
8373798: Refactor java/math tests to use JUnit#28848rgiulietti wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back rgiulietti! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@rgiulietti This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 17 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@rgiulietti The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
| ("NumberFormatException should not have a cause"); | ||
| } else { | ||
| throw nfe; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you want, you could use NumberFormatException nfe = assertThrows(..) here, then assert the cause. That would avoid mixing JUnit asserts with explicit throw of RuntimeException.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's just the result of a mechanical conversion of the original testng-based code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay, but you could go the extra mile and replace the throw of RuntimeException as it looks very strange to have the test be a JUnit test and still have this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is my plan to review all numerics related tests, rewriting some of those that do not use any framework to use junit in the end.
For now, the priority is to remove the dependencies on testng.
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit fc76403.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@rgiulietti Pushed as commit fc76403. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Replace testng framework with junit
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28848/head:pull/28848$ git checkout pull/28848Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28848$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28848/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28848View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28848Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28848.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment