Skip to content

8373837: "assert(thread->is_VM_thread() || thread->is_Java_thread()) failed: Must be VMThread or JavaThread" on macosx-aarch64-26#28883

Closed
dholmes-ora wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
dholmes-ora:8373837-SR-handler
Closed

8373837: "assert(thread->is_VM_thread() || thread->is_Java_thread()) failed: Must be VMThread or JavaThread" on macosx-aarch64-26#28883
dholmes-ora wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
dholmes-ora:8373837-SR-handler

Conversation

@dholmes-ora
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora commented Dec 18, 2025

If the SR signal is delivered late, there is a small window where the JavaThread destructor has run (and so the referenced assert will fail), but the Thread destructor has not yet reached the point where is_terminated returns true, and so we proceed to the assertion, that then fails. The simple fix is to move the assertion into the branch for an active suspension request, which guarantees we can't be executing destructors yet. See JBS for gory details.

EDIT: s/can/can't/

Testing: tiers 1-3 (sanity)

Thanks


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8373837: "assert(thread->is_VM_thread() || thread->is_Java_thread()) failed: Must be VMThread or JavaThread" on macosx-aarch64-26 (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28883/head:pull/28883
$ git checkout pull/28883

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28883
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28883/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28883

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28883

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28883.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

…failed: Must be VMThread or JavaThread" on macosx-aarch64-26
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 18, 2025

👋 Welcome back dholmes! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 18, 2025

@dholmes-ora This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8373837: "assert(thread->is_VM_thread() || thread->is_Java_thread()) failed: Must be VMThread or JavaThread" on macosx-aarch64-26

Reviewed-by: fbredberg, coleenp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 26 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 18, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 18, 2025

@dholmes-ora The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 18, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@fbredber fbredber left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a small window for a race. The fix looks reasonable.

@dholmes-ora
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the reviews @fbredber and @coleenp !

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Going to push as commit f0add88.
Since your change was applied there have been 27 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 19, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 19, 2025

@dholmes-ora Pushed as commit f0add88.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora deleted the 8373837-SR-handler branch December 19, 2025 02:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants