Skip to content

8255463: java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/InheritedChannelTest.java failed with ThreadTimeoutException#28888

Closed
Shivangi-aa wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:jdk26from
Shivangi-aa:backport-8255463
Closed

8255463: java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/InheritedChannelTest.java failed with ThreadTimeoutException#28888
Shivangi-aa wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:jdk26from
Shivangi-aa:backport-8255463

Conversation

@Shivangi-aa
Copy link

@Shivangi-aa Shivangi-aa commented Dec 18, 2025

Ran the test 50 times and it passed . Straight Backport.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8255463: java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/InheritedChannelTest.java failed with ThreadTimeoutException (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28888/head:pull/28888
$ git checkout pull/28888

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28888
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28888/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28888

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28888

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28888.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 18, 2025

👋 Welcome back sshivang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into jdk26 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 18, 2025

@Shivangi-aa This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8255463: java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/InheritedChannelTest.java failed with ThreadTimeoutException

Reviewed-by: jpai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the jdk26 branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@jaikiran) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport a26221299e657b64379d2d56ed3b073f12b227d1 8255463: java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/InheritedChannelTest.java failed with ThreadTimeoutException Dec 18, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 18, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required nio nio-dev@openjdk.org labels Dec 18, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 18, 2025

@Shivangi-aa The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • nio

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 18, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@jaikiran jaikiran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 18, 2025
@Shivangi-aa
Copy link
Author

Shivangi-aa commented Dec 18, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Dec 18, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 18, 2025

@Shivangi-aa
Your change (at version b1e8b0b) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Going to push as commit 509ca63.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the jdk26 branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 18, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 18, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Dec 18, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 18, 2025

@jaikiran @Shivangi-aa Pushed as commit 509ca63.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required integrated Pull request has been integrated nio nio-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants