Skip to content

8373105: Test tools/jpackage/share/AsyncTest.java failed: problem running hdiutil#28912

Closed
sashamatveev wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
sashamatveev:JDK-8373105
Closed

8373105: Test tools/jpackage/share/AsyncTest.java failed: problem running hdiutil#28912
sashamatveev wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
sashamatveev:JDK-8373105

Conversation

@sashamatveev
Copy link
Member

@sashamatveev sashamatveev commented Dec 18, 2025

  • I was not able to reproduce this issue.
  • Based on log we calling same detach command simultaneously:
[08:49:10.288] TRACE: exec: Execute [/usr/bin/hdiutil detach -force -verbose /Volumes/Foo](5); discard out+err...
[08:49:10.274] TRACE: exec: Execute [/usr/bin/hdiutil detach -force -verbose /Volumes/Foo](5); discard out+err...
  • I think hdiutil does not handle attaching/detaching DMG with same name asynchronously multiple times well enough.
  • Fixed by mounting DMG into random location.
  • Added -nobrowse, so DMG will not be added to Finder. We do not need DMG to be shown in Finder when attached during test.

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8373105: Test tools/jpackage/share/AsyncTest.java failed: problem running hdiutil (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28912/head:pull/28912
$ git checkout pull/28912

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28912
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28912/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28912

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28912

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28912.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 18, 2025

👋 Welcome back almatvee! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 18, 2025

@sashamatveev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8373105: Test tools/jpackage/share/AsyncTest.java failed: problem running hdiutil

Reviewed-by: asemenyuk

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 37 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 18, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 18, 2025

@sashamatveev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 18, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Webrevs

@sashamatveev
Copy link
Member Author

@alexeysemenyukoracle Please review.

@alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member

I once suspected jpackage's DMG attach/detach code was not very reliable, as the fixed volume name is used and filed JDK-8371494 to investigate. Back then, as I never observed AsyncTest failures, I closed the CR as not an issue. It merely took some time to reveal the problem.

We need both jpackage and the test code fixed.

@sashamatveev
Copy link
Member Author

We do not need to fix jpackage. It is already uses random mount root. Example from trace:

/usr/bin/hdiutil attach /var/folders/dr/65dj5x3j0296mqtsn9z27xc80000gn/T/jdk.jpackage8052723072987214442/dmg-workdir/proto.dmg -verbose -mountroot /var/folders/dr/65dj5x3j0296mqtsn9z27xc80000gn/T/jdk.jpackage8052723072987214442/dmg-workdir

@alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member

Oh, right. The issue is with the hdiutil attach command, not with hdiutil create.

// See JDK-8373105. "hdiutil" does not handle such cases very good.
final Path mountRoot;
try {
mountRoot = Files.createTempDirectory("mountRoot");

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Temporary test files should be created in the test working directory. Use TKit.createTempDirectory("mount-root") instead.

It also makes the newly added TKit.deleteDirectoryRecursive(mountRoot, ""); call redundant, as the test working directory will be deleted automatically when the test exits.

TKit.createTempDirectory() throws unchecked exceptions; the try/catch is redundant.

@sashamatveev
Copy link
Member Author

8373105: Test tools/jpackage/share/AsyncTest.java failed: problem running hdiutil [v2]

  • TKit.createTempDirectory("mount-root") will be used instead of Files.createTempDirectory("mount-root")

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 19, 2025
@sashamatveev
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Going to push as commit 2d09284.
Since your change was applied there have been 38 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 19, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 19, 2025

@sashamatveev Pushed as commit 2d09284.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants