8374233: Overloaded constructor MountUnmountDisabler(jthread thread) is missed

[sspitsyn]

Please, review a jdk 26 backport. This pull request contains a clean backport of simple changeset f5249db from the openjdk/jdk repository.
This changeset was reviewed by Chris Plummer and Alex Menkov.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8374233: Overloaded constructor MountUnmountDisabler(jthread thread) is missed (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

• Alex Menkov (@alexmenkov - Reviewer)
• Chris Plummer (@plummercj - Reviewer)
• Leonid Mesnik (@lmesnik - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28968/head:pull/28968
$ git checkout pull/28968

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28968
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28968/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28968

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28968

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28968.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back sspitsyn! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into jdk26 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@sspitsyn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8374233: Overloaded constructor MountUnmountDisabler(jthread thread) is missed

Reviewed-by: amenkov, cjplummer, lmesnik

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the jdk26 branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the jdk26 branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@sspitsyn The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (0537614b)

[openjdk]

@sspitsyn The target repository add is not a valid target for backports.
List of valid target repositories: openjdk/jdk, openjdk/jdk11u, openjdk/jdk11u-dev, openjdk/jdk17u, openjdk/jdk17u-dev, openjdk/jdk21u, openjdk/jdk21u-dev, openjdk/jdk25u, openjdk/jdk25u-dev, openjdk/jdk26u, openjdk/jdk8u, openjdk/jdk8u-dev, openjdk/jfx, openjdk/jfx17u, openjdk/jfx21u, openjdk/jfx25u, openjdk/lilliput-jdk17u, openjdk/lilliput-jdk21u, openjdk/lilliput-jdk25u, openjdk/shenandoah-jdk21u, openjdk/shenandoah-jdk8u.
Supplying the organization/group prefix is optional.

[sspitsyn]

/label add serviceability

[openjdk]

@sspitsyn
The serviceability label was successfully added.

[sspitsyn]

Thank you for review, Alex!

[sspitsyn]

Thank you for review, Chris!

[sspitsyn]

Thank you for review, Leonid!

[sspitsyn]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 646037d.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the jdk26 branch:

• 535e8be: 8371948: TestStackOverflowDuringInit.java fails xss too small on linux-aarch64

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@sspitsyn Pushed as commit 646037d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.