8373427: StructuredTaskScope::join not clear if called with interrupted status set

[AlanBateman]

Small docs-only clarification to make it clearer that join throws InterruptedException if called with the current thread's interrupted status set. Also make it clear that the exception clears the interrupted status.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change requires CSR request JDK-8374578 to be approved
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issues

• JDK-8373427: StructuredTaskScope::join not clear if called with interrupted status set (Bug - P3)
• JDK-8374578: StructuredTaskScope::join not clear if called with interrupted status set (CSR)

Reviewers

• Jaikiran Pai (@jaikiran - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/29059/head:pull/29059
$ git checkout pull/29059

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/29059
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/29059/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 29059

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 29059

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29059.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[AlanBateman]

/csr

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back alanb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@AlanBateman This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8373427: StructuredTaskScope::join not clear if called with interrupted status set

Reviewed-by: jpai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 22 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• c1c0ac8: 8342772: Assert in LateInlineMHCallGenerator::do_late_inline_check
• 5c6947f: 8373429: gc/g1/TestCodeCacheUnloadDuringConcCycle fails on various platforms
• 6b3c1e0: 8373833: "error.cert.not.found" and "error.explicit-sign-no-cert" errors duplicate each other
• ... and 19 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/de81d38995356a2e8528a419ebd445e79cd136d1...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@AlanBateman an approved CSR request is already required for this pull request.

[openjdk]

@AlanBateman The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (c72b16f6)
• 00: Full (8bb3d684)

[jaikiran]

This looks good to me.

[viktorklang-ora]

Just offering a potential alternative formulation.

This method must only be called once, unless the previous invocation resulted in an {@code InterruptedException} being thrown.

[AlanBateman]

Just offering a potential alternative formulation.

This method must only be called once, unless the previous invocation resulted in an {@code InterruptedException} being thrown.

Thanks, I'll see if I can incorporate some of this into the existing sentence.

[viktorklang-ora]

Looks good, thanks Alan!

[viktorklang-ora]

I see @jaikiran is already on this, so I'll just chime in and say that it looks good from my perspective.

[AlanBateman]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 6af2742.
Since your change was applied there have been 26 commits pushed to the master branch:

• f83918c: 8369227: Virtual thread stuck in PARKED state
• 2074b97: 8374623: Move DependentAlwaysFalse variable template to its own file
• 7e18de1: 8374210: [BACKOUT] Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics
• ... and 23 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/de81d38995356a2e8528a419ebd445e79cd136d1...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@AlanBateman Pushed as commit 6af2742.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

[AlanBateman]

/backport :jdk26

[openjdk]

@AlanBateman the backport was successfully created on the branch backport-AlanBateman-6af27420-jdk26 in my personal fork of openjdk/jdk. To create a pull request with this backport targeting openjdk/jdk:jdk26, just click the following link:

➡️ Create pull request

The title of the pull request is automatically filled in correctly and below you find a suggestion for the pull request body:

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit 6af27420 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Alan Bateman on 7 Jan 2026 and was reviewed by Jaikiran Pai.

Thanks!

If you need to update the source branch of the pull then run the following commands in a local clone of your personal fork of openjdk/jdk:

$ git fetch https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk.git backport-AlanBateman-6af27420-jdk26:backport-AlanBateman-6af27420-jdk26
$ git checkout backport-AlanBateman-6af27420-jdk26
# make changes
$ git add paths/to/changed/files
$ git commit --message 'Describe additional changes made'
$ git push https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk.git backport-AlanBateman-6af27420-jdk26