-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8263380: Unintended use of Objects.nonNull in VarHandles #2914
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back redestad! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well spotted.
Nice catch! We have a test that is supposed to test this: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/test/jdk/java/foreign/TestNulls.java But it is only checking if an NPE is thrown, and not checking for a message, since |
@cl4es This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Right, checked that passes (had only run the java/lang/invoke tests locally). An alternative approach here is to verify all methods already implicitly check null and remove all these, but being explicit is nice and reduces possibility of surprise. |
/integrate |
@cl4es Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 7e52a6e. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
I found few more similar places in JFR code, where
|
Created an issue: JDK-8263395: Incorrect use of Objects.nonNull
|
Use requireNonNull instead.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2914/head:pull/2914
$ git checkout pull/2914