Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8263410: ListModel javadoc refers to non-existent interface #2931

wants to merge 2 commits into from


Copy link

@prsadhuk prsadhuk commented Mar 11, 2021

ListModel class javadoc refers to ListDataModel interface but there is no ListDataModel interface. Rectified the anomaly.


  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed


  • JDK-8263410: ListModel javadoc refers to non-existent interface



$ git fetch pull/2931/head:pull/2931
$ git checkout pull/2931

Copy link

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 11, 2021

👋 Welcome back psadhukhan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.


@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr label Mar 11, 2021
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Mar 11, 2021

@prsadhuk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • swing

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.


@openjdk openjdk bot added the swing label Mar 11, 2021
Copy link

@mlbridge mlbridge bot commented Mar 11, 2021



Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Mar 11, 2021

@prsadhuk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8263410: ListModel javadoc refers to non-existent interface

Reviewed-by: azvegint, pbansal, aivanov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 400 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • f3bd801: 8263403: [JVMCI] output written to tty via HotSpotJVMCIRuntime can be garbled
  • b92abac: 8263433: Shenandoah: Don't expect forwarded objects in set_concurrent_mark_in_progress()
  • 15dacca: 8263465: JDK-8236847 causes tier1 build failure on linux-aarch64
  • 7ed46bd: 8241716: Jpackage functionality to let users choose whether to create shortcuts
  • 3820ab9: 8236847: CDS archive with 4K alignment unusable on machines with 64k pages
  • 273f8bd: 8263248: IGV: accept graphs without node categories
  • a9b4f03: 8263069: Exclude some failing tests from security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator
  • 470b150: 8143041: Unify G1CollectorPolicy::PauseKind and G1YCType
  • f6b4ba0: 8261931: IGV: quick search fails on multi-line node labels
  • 7988c1d: 8262443: GenerateOopMap::do_interpretation can spin for a long time.
  • ... and 390 more:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.


@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready label Mar 11, 2021
Copy link
Contributor Author

@prsadhuk prsadhuk commented Mar 17, 2021



@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 17, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated and removed ready rfr labels Mar 17, 2021
@prsadhuk prsadhuk deleted the JDK-8263410 branch Mar 17, 2021
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Mar 17, 2021

@prsadhuk Since your change was applied there have been 476 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7b9d256: 8261262: crashed with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION
  • d2144a5: 8263058: Optimize vector shift with zero shift count
  • dd6c911: 8263705: Two shenandoah tests fail due to can't find ClassFileInstaller
  • 4acb883: 8261666: [mlvm] Remove WhiteBoxHelper
  • 5069796: 8263164: assert(_base >= VectorA && _base <= VectorZ) failed: Not a Vector while calling StoreVectorNode::memory_size()
  • 996079b: 8260650: test failed with "assert(false) failed: infinite loop in PhaseIterGVN::optimize"
  • 9cb9af6: 8260959: remove RECORDS from PreviewFeature.Feature enum
  • 05fe06a: 8255790: GTKL&F: Java 16 crashes on initialising GTKL&F on Manjaro Linux
  • 422eba8: 8263536: Add @build tags to jpackage tests
  • 0d2f87e: 8263562: Checking if proxy_klass_head is still lambda_proxy_is_available
  • ... and 466 more:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit ec95a5c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
4 participants