-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JDK-8263426: Reflow JfrNetworkUtilization::send_events #2935
Conversation
👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks.
@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 43 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
/integrate |
@shipilev Since your change was applied there have been 54 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit ff25939. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
SonarCloud instance reports a problem in JfrNetworkUtilization::send_events: "Identical sub-expressions on both sides of operator "-"." here:
Note
cur_time - cur_time
. It would seem thatinterval
is effectively zero whenlast_sample_instant
is not yet initialized. And I see that the subsequent code checks forinterval.value() > 0
for every interface. That can be optimized a bit: whenlast_sample_instant
is not available, do not enter the loop, and don't checkinterval.value()
.Additional testing:
jdk_jfr
on Linux x86_64Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2935/head:pull/2935
$ git checkout pull/2935