Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8263514: Minor issue in JavacFileManager.SortFiles.REVERSE #2970

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Mar 12, 2021

SonarCloud reports the problem in JavacFileManager.SortFiles.REVERSE definition:
Neither "Math.abs" nor negation should be used on numbers that could be "MIN_VALUE"

        REVERSE {
            @Override
            public int compare(Path f1, Path f2) {
                return -f1.getFileName().compareTo(f2.getFileName());
            }
        }

Since compareTo can technically return MIN_VALUE, we cannot simply negate it. Luckily, we can just swap the f1 and f2 comparison order to achieve the same effect without exposing us to this corner case.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8263514: Minor issue in JavacFileManager.SortFiles.REVERSE

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2970/head:pull/2970
$ git checkout pull/2970

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 12, 2021

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 12, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 12, 2021

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Mar 12, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 12, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vicente-romero-oracle vicente-romero-oracle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 15, 2021

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8263514: Minor issue in JavacFileManager.SortFiles.REVERSE

Reviewed-by: vromero

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 34 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 189289d: 8262326: MaxMetaspaceSize does not have to be aligned to metaspace commit alignment
  • d825198: 8263556: remove @modules java.base from tests
  • d6b5e18: 8263191: Consolidate ThreadInVMfromJavaNoAsyncException and ThreadBlockInVMWithDeadlockCheck with existing wrappers
  • 80cdf78: 8263544: Unused argument in ConstantPoolCacheEntry::set_field()
  • c0176c4: 8263552: Use String.valueOf() for char-to-String conversions
  • fac39fe: 8263508: Remove dead code in MethodHandleImpl
  • 7b4aefe: 8263530: sun.awt.X11.ListHelper.removeAll() should use clear()
  • 32c7fcc: 8263490: [macos] Crash occurs on JPasswordField with activated InputMethod
  • 8afec70: 8260931: Implement JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline
  • 0638303: 8263497: Clean up sun.security.krb5.PrincipalName::toByteArray
  • ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/a9b156d358b0436584a33f71abc00c9bed9d47a3...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 15, 2021
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks!

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 15, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 15, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 15, 2021

@shipilev Since your change was applied there have been 36 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 771b146: 8245025: MoveAndUpdateClosure::do_addr calls function with side-effects in an assert
  • 46d78f0: 6539707: (fc) MappedByteBuffer.force() method throws an IOException in a very simple test
  • 189289d: 8262326: MaxMetaspaceSize does not have to be aligned to metaspace commit alignment
  • d825198: 8263556: remove @modules java.base from tests
  • d6b5e18: 8263191: Consolidate ThreadInVMfromJavaNoAsyncException and ThreadBlockInVMWithDeadlockCheck with existing wrappers
  • 80cdf78: 8263544: Unused argument in ConstantPoolCacheEntry::set_field()
  • c0176c4: 8263552: Use String.valueOf() for char-to-String conversions
  • fac39fe: 8263508: Remove dead code in MethodHandleImpl
  • 7b4aefe: 8263530: sun.awt.X11.ListHelper.removeAll() should use clear()
  • 32c7fcc: 8263490: [macos] Crash occurs on JPasswordField with activated InputMethod
  • ... and 26 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/a9b156d358b0436584a33f71abc00c9bed9d47a3...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 5ab5244.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@shipilev shipilev deleted the JDK-8263514-javac-reverse branch March 25, 2021 11:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants