-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
JDK-8263545: Convert jpackage to use Stream.toList() #2997
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back igraves! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why this explicit cast is needed here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The explicit cast is needed because Stream.toList() is invariant, but the stream is producing a covariant type (by way of the type inferencer and Stream.of(..) accepting two subclasses of WixFragmentBuilder). We need to introduce a hint to bring the type back to the invariant form. On second thought I'm going to make this explicit type argument instead so it's clear that the casting isn't part to what the code is otherwise doing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this can be simplified down to components.stream().toArray(BigInteger[]::new);
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch!
alexeysemenyukoracle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Minor improvements suggested.
|
@igraves This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 89 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@alexeysemenyukoracle, @sashamatveev) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
|
/integrate |
|
@igraves |
ce11489 to
37d3692
Compare
|
@igraves as a "best practice" try to avoid doing a force-push to a branch with an active code review. It makes it hard for reviewers to see what has changed. If you need to merge changes from master, use "git merge master" instead. @alexeysemenyukoracle @sashamatveev Can you re-review this so Ian can integrate it? |
|
@kevinrushforth Understood, thanks! |
|
Looks fine. |
|
/integrate |
|
Ready for sponsoring when you all are. |
|
/sponsor |
|
@alexeysemenyukoracle @igraves Since your change was applied there have been 92 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 0b5216a. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This converts jpackage to use
Stream.toList()instead ofStream.collect(Collectors.toList()). One piece of code was modified to not mutate a list in addition to one test that used a mutating sort on a list. The rest of the changes are simple substitutions.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
To checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2997/head:pull/2997$ git checkout pull/2997To update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2997$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2997/head