-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8264001: JFR: Modernize implementation #3138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back egahlin! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
/label remove net |
|
@egahlin |
mgronlun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
|
@egahlin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 29 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
/integrate |
|
@egahlin Since your change was applied there have been 42 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit ae9af57. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
| Object[] array = getTyped("frames", Object[].class, null); | ||
| if (array == null) { | ||
| return Collections.EMPTY_LIST; | ||
| return new ArrayList<>(0); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why ArrayList is used here and not List.of() as everywhere else?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanted it to be consistent.
Now the list is always modifiable, regardless of how it is constructed. One could argue for always returning an unmodifiable list, but it would require a spec change.
Hi,
Could I have a review of changes that updates the Java implementation of JFR with newer language constructs and library calls. I also removed unused imports, dead code and added @OverRide where approriate.
Testing: jdk/jdk/jfr
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
To checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3138/head:pull/3138$ git checkout pull/3138To update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3138$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3138/head