Skip to content

8264041: Incorrect comments for ParallelCompactData::summarize_dense_prefix #3152

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

albertnetymk
Copy link
Member

@albertnetymk albertnetymk commented Mar 23, 2021

Trivial change of fixing comments.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8264041: Incorrect comments for ParallelCompactData::summarize_dense_prefix

Reviewers

Download

To checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3152/head:pull/3152
$ git checkout pull/3152

To update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3152
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3152/head

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 23, 2021

👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 23, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 23, 2021

@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label Mar 23, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 23, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am assuming that the asserts in the first two lines of the implementation are correct :) Looks good and trivial.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 23, 2021

@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8264041: Incorrect comments for ParallelCompactData::summarize_dense_prefix

Reviewed-by: tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 23, 2021
@albertnetymk
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the review.

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 23, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 23, 2021
@albertnetymk albertnetymk deleted the comment branch March 23, 2021 18:19
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 23, 2021

@albertnetymk Since your change was applied there have been 3 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c087f3e: 8263995: Incorrect double-checked locking in Types.arraySuperType()
  • d7268fa: 8251942: PrintStream specification is not clear which flush method is automatically invoked
  • 8fa34e4: 8241619: (fs) Files.newByteChannel(path, Set.of(CREATE_NEW, READ)) does not throw a FileAlreadyExistsException when the file exists

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 087c8bf.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants