8264109: Add vectorized implementation for VectorMask.andNot() #3211
Currently "VectorMask.andNot()" is not vectorized:
This can be implemented with
The performance gain is >100% for such a simple JMH:
@XiaohongGong To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.
Hi @PaulSandoz , thanks for looking at this PR. I'v updated the patch according to your comments. Would you mind having look at it again? Thanks so much!
@XiaohongGong This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.
After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
At the time when this comment was updated there had been 145 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.
As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@PaulSandoz, @nsjian) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.
Pushed as commit 7d0a0ba.