-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8264324: Simplify allocation list management in OopStorage::reduce_deferred_updates #3227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back kbarrett! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@kimbarrett The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seem good.
@kimbarrett This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks for reviews @tschatzl and @albertnetymk . |
/integrate |
@kimbarrett Pushed as commit 4ea6abf. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Please review this cleanup of the allocation list management performed by OopStorage::reduce_deferred_updates. Part of its job is to take a block whose allocation set has changed and update its place in the allocation list accordingly. The old code has somewhat confusing logic and does unnecessary work in some cases. The new code is clearer and avoids that excess work. (I'm not sure what I was thinking when I wrote the old code.)
Testing:
mach5 tier1
I've also been using this patch for some time under other in-development changes that make heavy use of OopStorage.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3227/head:pull/3227
$ git checkout pull/3227
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3227
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3227/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3227
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3227
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3227.diff