Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8253583: java/util/StringJoiner tests failing on 32-bit VMs after JDK-8246697 #331

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Sep 24, 2020

JDK-8246697 added -Xmx4g to test configurations. 32-bit VMs cannot do it. @requires tests the OS RAM size, but you can easily have the x86_32 host with more than 4G ram, yet JVM would fail to acquire that heap size. Need to check for bitness explicitly.

Testing:

  • java/util/StringJoiner on x86_64 (still run)
  • java/util/StringJoiner on x86_32 (skipped now)

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8253583: java/util/StringJoiner tests failing on 32-bit VMs after JDK-8246697

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/331/head:pull/331
$ git checkout pull/331

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 24, 2020

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 24, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 24, 2020

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request: core-libs.

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an RFR email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label (add|remove) "label" command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 24, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 24, 2020

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 24, 2020

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for more details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8253583: java/util/StringJoiner tests failing on 32-bit VMs after JDK-8246697

Reviewed-by: alanb, tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 28 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b1e2f02: 8253524: C2: Refactor code that clones predicates during loop unswitching
  • c303fd5: 8253581: runtime/stringtable/StringTableCleaningTest.java fails on 32-bit platforms
  • f3ea0d3: 8252583: Clean up unused phi-to-copy degradation mechanism
  • 4440bda: 8219586: CodeHeap State Analytics processes dead nmethods
  • 154b8cf: 8253014: OopStorage bulk release logs entries multiple times
  • ba174af: 8253048: AArch64: When CallLeaf, no need to preserve callee-saved registers in caller
  • 3320fc0: 8253372: [TESTBUG] update tests which require jvmti - hotspot
  • f765a7f: 8252712: move doclint to jdk.javadoc module
  • c21690b: 8253464: ARM32 Zero: atomic_copy64 is incorrect, breaking volatile stores
  • 0bc01da: 8250635: MethodArityHistogram should use Compile_lock in favour of fancy checks
  • ... and 18 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/8c02bdbf13bc8258bbdb6c45fd3b3ba4c6f8971b...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 24, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

Trivial, right?

@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor

Trivial.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 24, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated labels Sep 24, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 24, 2020

@shipilev Since your change was applied there have been 28 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b1e2f02: 8253524: C2: Refactor code that clones predicates during loop unswitching
  • c303fd5: 8253581: runtime/stringtable/StringTableCleaningTest.java fails on 32-bit platforms
  • f3ea0d3: 8252583: Clean up unused phi-to-copy degradation mechanism
  • 4440bda: 8219586: CodeHeap State Analytics processes dead nmethods
  • 154b8cf: 8253014: OopStorage bulk release logs entries multiple times
  • ba174af: 8253048: AArch64: When CallLeaf, no need to preserve callee-saved registers in caller
  • 3320fc0: 8253372: [TESTBUG] update tests which require jvmti - hotspot
  • f765a7f: 8252712: move doclint to jdk.javadoc module
  • c21690b: 8253464: ARM32 Zero: atomic_copy64 is incorrect, breaking volatile stores
  • 0bc01da: 8250635: MethodArityHistogram should use Compile_lock in favour of fancy checks
  • ... and 18 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/8c02bdbf13bc8258bbdb6c45fd3b3ba4c6f8971b...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit dd2c456.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 24, 2020
@shipilev shipilev deleted the JDK-8253583-StringJoiner branch September 24, 2020 11:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants