JDK-8264655: Minor internal doc comment cleanup

[jonathan-gibbons]

Please review some minor updates to internal doc comments on javadoc code.

In addition, since this is just a cleanup PR, some redundant modifiers noted by an IDE have been removed.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8264655: Minor internal doc comment cleanup

Reviewers

• Pavel Rappo (@pavelrappo - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3327/head:pull/3327
$ git checkout pull/3327

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3327
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3327/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3327

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3327

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3327.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back jjg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@jonathan-gibbons The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• javadoc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (2eb3263e)

[pavelrappo]

Looks good.

[pavelrappo]

Thanks for removing those two @author entries. Did they slip through the review of "8235435: Remove (obsolete) @author info from javadoc source and test" or this file was added later?

[jonathan-gibbons]

The file was moved here from the jdk.compiler module, where we have not removed the @author comments.

[openjdk]

@jonathan-gibbons This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8264655: Minor internal doc comment cleanup

Reviewed-by: prappo

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 4133ded: 8264658: ProblemList javax/swing/JInternalFrame/8146321/JInternalFrameIconTest.java on linux-x64
• 220ddbd: 8264657: ProblemList java/awt/Focus/FrameMinimizeTest/FrameMinimizeTest.java on linux-x64
• d0f3cc9: 8264656: ProblemList sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/SSLSocketImplThrowsWrongExceptions.java on linux-x64

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[jonathan-gibbons]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@jonathan-gibbons Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 3991b32: 8264539: Improve failure message of java/nio/file/WatchService/SensitivityModifier.java
• 4133ded: 8264658: ProblemList javax/swing/JInternalFrame/8146321/JInternalFrameIconTest.java on linux-x64
• 220ddbd: 8264657: ProblemList java/awt/Focus/FrameMinimizeTest/FrameMinimizeTest.java on linux-x64
• d0f3cc9: 8264656: ProblemList sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/SSLSocketImplThrowsWrongExceptions.java on linux-x64

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit eb0ac86.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.