Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8233567: [TESTBUG] FocusSubRequestTest.java fails on macos #3430

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor

@prsadhuk prsadhuk commented Apr 12, 2021

This test was problemlisted during nightly testing of jdk on macos which seems to be caused by the fact that proper waiting was not done to make sure frame is visible before commencing the test, which can be problematic in some of the slower CI macos system.
Modified the wait-till-frame-is-visible code to make it more in sync with what other similar test use.
Several iterations of the test works fine in all platforms after this modification.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8233567: [TESTBUG] FocusSubRequestTest.java fails on macos

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3430/head:pull/3430
$ git checkout pull/3430

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3430
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3430/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3430

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3430

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3430.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 12, 2021

👋 Welcome back psadhukhan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 12, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 12, 2021

@prsadhuk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • awt

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the awt client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 12, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 12, 2021

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 12, 2021

@prsadhuk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8233567: [TESTBUG] FocusSubRequestTest.java fails on macos

Reviewed-by: azvegint, pbansal

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 10 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 125184e: 8265012: Shenandoah: Backout JDK-8264718
  • be0d46c: 8262068: Improve G1 Full GC by skipping compaction for regions with high survival ratio
  • f71be8b: 8264954: unified handling for VectorMask object re-materialization during de-optimization
  • 3c9858d: 8264827: Large mapped buffer/segment crash the VM when calling isLoaded
  • e604320: 8264783: G1 BOT verification should not verify beyond allocation threshold
  • cb2806d: 8265018: [AIX] FileDispatcherImpl.c:31:10: fatal error: 'sys/mount.h' file not found
  • ecef1fc: 8264972: Unused TypeFunc declared in OptoRuntime
  • 440c34a: 8264644: Add PrintClassLoaderDataGraphAtExit to print the detailed CLD graph
  • b1ebf82: 8264358: Don't create invalid oop in method handle tracing
  • 627ad9f: 8262328: Templatize JVMFlag boilerplate access methods

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 12, 2021
@prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 12, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 12, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 12, 2021

@prsadhuk Since your change was applied there have been 10 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 125184e: 8265012: Shenandoah: Backout JDK-8264718
  • be0d46c: 8262068: Improve G1 Full GC by skipping compaction for regions with high survival ratio
  • f71be8b: 8264954: unified handling for VectorMask object re-materialization during de-optimization
  • 3c9858d: 8264827: Large mapped buffer/segment crash the VM when calling isLoaded
  • e604320: 8264783: G1 BOT verification should not verify beyond allocation threshold
  • cb2806d: 8265018: [AIX] FileDispatcherImpl.c:31:10: fatal error: 'sys/mount.h' file not found
  • ecef1fc: 8264972: Unused TypeFunc declared in OptoRuntime
  • 440c34a: 8264644: Add PrintClassLoaderDataGraphAtExit to print the detailed CLD graph
  • b1ebf82: 8264358: Don't create invalid oop in method handle tracing
  • 627ad9f: 8262328: Templatize JVMFlag boilerplate access methods

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit b90ad76.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@prsadhuk prsadhuk deleted the JDK-8233567 branch April 12, 2021 15:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awt client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants