-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8265154: vinserti128 operand mix up for KNL platforms #3480
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back sviswanathan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
/label add hotspot-compiler |
/label remove hotspot |
@sviswa7 |
@sviswa7 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. Just wondering, why did this never show up? Are we missing tests exercising this code path?
@sviswa7 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 73 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What problems this is causing? Would be nice to have a test to show the issue (if possible).
@vnkozlov @TobiHartmann Thanks a lot for the review. Majority of the places where vinserti128 is used in code gen, the dst and nds are passed as same register. Only in the implementation of VectorInsert node for vector api, the dst and nds are different. The vector api tests are run as part of tier 3. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good.
So it was caught by existing tests.
Thanks @vnkozlov. Yes, it was caught by existing tests. |
/integrate |
@sviswa7 Since your change was applied there have been 74 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit c108e7a. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
There is a bug in macro assembler in vinserti128 special handling for platforms like KNL that do not support AVX512VL.
The following:
void vinserti128(XMMRegister dst, XMMRegister nds, XMMRegister src, uint8_t imm8) {
if (UseAVX > 2 && VM_Version::supports_avx512novl()) {
Assembler::vinserti32x4(dst, dst, src, imm8);
}
...
}
Should have been:
void vinserti128(XMMRegister dst, XMMRegister nds, XMMRegister src, uint8_t imm8) {
if (UseAVX > 2 && VM_Version::supports_avx512novl()) {
Assembler::vinserti32x4(dst, nds, src, imm8);
}
...
}
Best Regards,
Sandhya
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3480/head:pull/3480
$ git checkout pull/3480
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3480
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3480/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3480
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3480
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3480.diff