8262883: doccheck: Broken links in java.base

[Michael-Mc-Mahon]

Hi,

Could I get the following trivial doc changes reviewed please, caused by:

• broken tags in MethodHandles referring to package.html instead of package-summary.html

• references to a package level #unixdomain anchor that no longer exists.

• a tag missing a "../" in SocketChannel

Thanks,

Michael

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8262883: doccheck: Broken links in java.base

Reviewers

• Lance Andersen (@LanceAndersen - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3491/head:pull/3491
$ git checkout pull/3491

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3491
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3491/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3491

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3491

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3491.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back michaelm! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@Michael-Mc-Mahon The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs
• net

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (fbe7df33)

[Michael-Mc-Mahon]

/label add nio

[openjdk]

@Michael-Mc-Mahon
The nio label was successfully added.

[openjdk]

@Michael-Mc-Mahon This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8262883: doccheck: Broken links in java.base

Reviewed-by: lancea

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 75b039a: 8263970: Manual test javax/swing/JTextField/JapaneseReadingAttributes/JapaneseReadingAttributes.java failed
• f5b2f08: 8257836: Add additional test cases to TestSyncOnValueBasedClassEvent.java
• 27dd88b: 8262957: (fs) Fail fast in UnixFileStore.isExtendedAttributesEnabled

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[Michael-Mc-Mahon]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@Michael-Mc-Mahon Since your change was applied there have been 3 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 75b039a: 8263970: Manual test javax/swing/JTextField/JapaneseReadingAttributes/JapaneseReadingAttributes.java failed
• f5b2f08: 8257836: Add additional test cases to TestSyncOnValueBasedClassEvent.java
• 27dd88b: 8262957: (fs) Fail fast in UnixFileStore.isExtendedAttributesEnabled

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 4661690.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

[AlanBateman]

The parameter to this method is a ProtocolFamily and maybe this note should be say that StandardProtocolFamily#UNIX is not supported.

[Michael-Mc-Mahon]

Okay, reasonable suggestion. I was a bit quick integrating. I will file a new issue to update the spec as suggested.

[RogerRiggs]

Integrating less than an hour after the PR is started seems to be a bit too quick to allow useful input.
Perhaps even for 'trivial' changes.