-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8265326: Strange Characters in G1GC GC Log #3589
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back fmatte! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
FormatBuffer<128> _format("Concurrent %s Cycle", _state == FullMark ? "Mark" : "Undo"); | ||
GCTraceConcTime(Info, gc) tt(_format); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FormatBuffer<128> _format("Concurrent %s Cycle", _state == FullMark ? "Mark" : "Undo"); | |
GCTraceConcTime(Info, gc) tt(_format); | |
FormatBuffer<128> title("Concurrent %s Cycle", _state == FullMark ? "Mark" : "Undo"); | |
GCTraceConcTime(Info, gc) tt(title); |
Leading underscores are reserved for members of structs and classes in Hotspot. I suggested title
here, but format
would be as good.
Apart from that lgtm. Thanks for investigating this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was just about to make the same comment :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Tomas for the review, will update with title
@fmatte1 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 26 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@tschatzl, @kstefanj, @kimbarrett) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated, as per the Thomas suggestions
/integrate |
@tschatzl Please sponsor this change (I am not a committer), |
Will do after the 24h wait period expires tomorrow. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Did you do any further analysis why the explicit variable was needed? I see there is at least one more place where a FormatBuffer
is used in a constructor.
Looks good. The lifetime of the FormatBuffer temporary ends when the declaration statement ends, not when the declared variable's lifetime ends. |
Thanks Stefan and Kim for the reviews, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still good.
/sponsor |
@tschatzl @fmatte1 Since your change was applied there have been 26 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit da86029. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
There was an character formating issue on mac-os due to usage of "
FormatBuffer<128>
"Used explicit variable to hold the FormatBuffer
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3589/head:pull/3589
$ git checkout pull/3589
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3589
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3589/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3589
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3589
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3589.diff