New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8253639: Change os::attempt_reserve_memory_at parameter order #359
8253639: Change os::attempt_reserve_memory_at parameter order #359
Conversation
👋 Welcome back stefank! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@stefank |
Looks good to me. I still learn to skara and just noticed that as a reviewer I cannot use /reviewer. Since this PR contains commits from some other PR, I don't know how to mark this as reviewed. |
Thanks Thomas. You need to click "Files changed" then "Review Changes" to review this. I don't think there's a /reviewer command you can use. I'll ask. |
Currently, the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Parameter reordering looks good.
@stefank This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for more details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Could you add an explanation in the bug report for the reason of this change? |
Sure. I thought it was obvious, but I agree a comment would be good. I added:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
Thanks all for reviewing! |
Continuing this experiment to build a PR on top of another PR. I added a commit to parent PR pull/357, merged in master, and pushed pull/359's branch. "Files changed" now looks as expected, and only contains the changes relevant for this PR. |
/integrate |
@stefank Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit ca1ed16. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
I propose that we change the parameter order from:
os::attempt_reserve_memory_at(size, addr, )
to:
os::attempt_reserve_memory_at(addr, size, )
This patch builds upon the changes in pull/357. There's currently no way to create an incremental review, but I want to get this out for review now. So, unfortunately you have to ignore the first commit and look at the second commit.
/label hotspot
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/359/head:pull/359
$ git checkout pull/359