8265914: Duplicated NotANode and not_a_node

[y1yang0]

NotANode(node.hpp) and not_a_node(compile.cpp) are completely repeated guys.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8265914: Duplicated NotANode and not_a_node

Reviewers

• Tobias Hartmann (@TobiHartmann - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3715/head:pull/3715
$ git checkout pull/3715

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3715
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3715/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3715

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3715

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3715.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back yyang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@kelthuzadx The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot-compiler
• serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (cedc8761)

[y1yang0]

/label remove serviceability

[openjdk]

@kelthuzadx
The serviceability label was successfully removed.

[TobiHartmann]

Looks good and trivial to me.

[openjdk]

@kelthuzadx This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8265914: Duplicated NotANode and not_a_node

Reviewed-by: thartmann

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 149 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 9adbf15: 8265995: Shenandoah: Move ShenandoahInitMarkRootsClosure close to its use
• 879a77f: 8265757: stack-use-after-scope in perfMemory_posix.cpp get_user_name_slow()
• e4be968: 8265980: Fix systemDictionary and loaderConstraints printing
• f6e26f6: 8265756: AArch64: initialize memory allocated for locals according to Windows AArch64 stack page growth requirement in template interpreter
• 0a4c338: 8263432: javac may report an invalid package/class clash on case insensitive filesystems
• 82b3719: 8265967: Unused NullCheckNode forward declaration in node.hpp
• 468c847: 8234020: Remove FullGCCount_lock
• 4785e11: 8264806: Remove the experimental JIT compiler
• 7db9330: 8196300: java/awt/TextArea/TextAreaScrolling/TextAreaScrolling.java times out
• 694aced: 8264805: Remove the experimental Ahead-of-Time Compiler
• ... and 139 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/c88714875d179d53bb8fd83ca68f21e977b17be0...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@TobiHartmann) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[y1yang0]

Thank you Tobias! Trivial indeed.

/integrate

[openjdk]

@kelthuzadx
Your change (at version cedc876) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[TobiHartmann]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

@TobiHartmann @kelthuzadx Since your change was applied there have been 150 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 9481fad: 8163367: Test javax/swing/JComboBox/8033069/bug8033069NoScrollBar.java javax/swing/JComboBox/8033069/bug8033069ScrollBar.java fails intermittently
• 9adbf15: 8265995: Shenandoah: Move ShenandoahInitMarkRootsClosure close to its use
• 879a77f: 8265757: stack-use-after-scope in perfMemory_posix.cpp get_user_name_slow()
• e4be968: 8265980: Fix systemDictionary and loaderConstraints printing
• f6e26f6: 8265756: AArch64: initialize memory allocated for locals according to Windows AArch64 stack page growth requirement in template interpreter
• 0a4c338: 8263432: javac may report an invalid package/class clash on case insensitive filesystems
• 82b3719: 8265967: Unused NullCheckNode forward declaration in node.hpp
• 468c847: 8234020: Remove FullGCCount_lock
• 4785e11: 8264806: Remove the experimental JIT compiler
• 7db9330: 8196300: java/awt/TextArea/TextAreaScrolling/TextAreaScrolling.java times out
• ... and 140 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/c88714875d179d53bb8fd83ca68f21e977b17be0...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit fbfd4ea.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.