Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8266188: mark hotspot compiler/cpuflags tests which ignore VM flags #3752

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@iignatev
Copy link
Member

@iignatev iignatev commented Apr 28, 2021

Hi all,

could you please review this small and trivial patch that adds @requires vm.flagless to compiler/cpuflags tests that ignore VM flags?

Thanks,
-- Igor


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8266188: mark hotspot compiler/cpuflags tests which ignore VM flags

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3752/head:pull/3752
$ git checkout pull/3752

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3752
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3752/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3752

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3752

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3752.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 28, 2021

👋 Welcome back iignatyev! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

Loading

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8266188 8266188: mark hotspot compiler/cpuflags tests which ignore VM flags Apr 28, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr label Apr 28, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Apr 28, 2021

@iignatev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

Loading

@mlbridge
Copy link

@mlbridge mlbridge bot commented Apr 28, 2021

Webrevs

Loading

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Looks good.

Loading

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Apr 28, 2021

@iignatev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8266188: mark hotspot compiler/cpuflags tests which ignore VM flags

Reviewed-by: chagedorn, thartmann

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 24 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 343a4a7: 8185127: Add tests to cover hashCode() method for java supported crypto key types
  • e325a75: 8264593: debug.cpp utilities should be available in product builds.
  • e879f8c: 8265587: IGV: track nodes across matching
  • 164454f: 8265867: thread.hpp defines some enums but no reference
  • 75a2354: 8266028: C2 computes -0.0 for Math.pow(-0.0, 0.5)
  • ca37be1: 8197800: Test java/awt/Focus/NonFocusableWindowTest/NoEventsTest.java fails on Windows
  • cf92693: 8198619: java/awt/Focus/FocusTraversalPolicy/ButtonGroupLayoutTraversal/ButtonGroupLayoutTraversalTest.java fails on mac
  • 2201e11: 8266055: ZGC: ZHeap::print_extended_on() doesn't disable deferred delete
  • ce48f04: 8198617: java/awt/Focus/6382144/EndlessLoopTest.java fails on mac
  • 0438cea: 8136517: [macosx]Test java/awt/Focus/8073453/AWTFocusTransitionTest.java fails on MacOSX
  • ... and 14 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/7f4a9f68bfd6fd002f79ac989155550db0bcdd20...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

Loading

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready label Apr 28, 2021
@iignatev
Copy link
Member Author

@iignatev iignatev commented Apr 28, 2021

Christian, Tobias, thank you for your reviews.

/integrate

Loading

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 28, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated and removed ready rfr labels Apr 28, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Apr 28, 2021

@iignatev Since your change was applied there have been 28 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 19d3c45: 8266184: a few compiler/debug tests don't check exit code
  • 7e3bc4c: 8228442: DHKeyExchange/LegacyDHEKeyExchange.java failed due to "SSLException: An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine"
  • f40bf1d: 8266087: Move 'buffer' declaration in get_user_name_slow() inside of linux specific code
  • ec383ab: 8183374: Refactor java/lang/Runtime shell tests to java
  • 343a4a7: 8185127: Add tests to cover hashCode() method for java supported crypto key types
  • e325a75: 8264593: debug.cpp utilities should be available in product builds.
  • e879f8c: 8265587: IGV: track nodes across matching
  • 164454f: 8265867: thread.hpp defines some enums but no reference
  • 75a2354: 8266028: C2 computes -0.0 for Math.pow(-0.0, 0.5)
  • ca37be1: 8197800: Test java/awt/Focus/NonFocusableWindowTest/NoEventsTest.java fails on Windows
  • ... and 18 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/7f4a9f68bfd6fd002f79ac989155550db0bcdd20...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 8954bef.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Loading

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
3 participants