8266498: Make debug ps() call print_stack

[coleenp]

Fix ps() call print_stack. Tested manually and with fastdebug and debug. Also removed hsfind() because find() is the same thing and nobody's using dbx anymore (and the overload that made me add it might be long gone).
Tested with tier1 sanity.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8266498: Make debug ps() call print_stack

Reviewers

• Thomas Stuefe (@tstuefe - Reviewer)
• Lois Foltan (@lfoltan - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3861/head:pull/3861
$ git checkout pull/3861

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3861
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3861/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3861

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3861

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3861.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@coleenp The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (de735f3e)

[tstuefe]

Looks fine to me.

[openjdk]

@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8266498: Make debug ps() call print_stack

Reviewed-by: stuefe, lfoltan

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 770dfc1: 8265279: Remove unused RandomGeneratorFactory.all(Class category)
• ee5bba0: 8265767: compiler/eliminateAutobox/TestIntBoxing.java crashes on arm32 after 8264649 in debug VMs

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[lfoltan]

Looks good.
Lois

[coleenp]

Thanks Lois and Thomas.

[coleenp]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@coleenp Since your change was applied there have been 24 commits pushed to the master branch:

• ef0f693: 8266499: Delete dead code in aarch64.ad
• 71d0858: 8266522: Shenandoah: Shenandoah LRB calls wrong runtime barrier on aarch64
• 0ac84d1: 8266506: [aix] Treat mapping attempt too close to BRK as a mapping error
• 02cdd6e: 8266419: [aix] in mmap mode, os::attempt_reserve_memory_at() fails to handle wrong mapping address
• 250b45a: 8266222: [aix] In mmap-mode, partial releases with os::release_memory may trash internal bookkeeping
• 65ce4d2: 8266491: Remove resolve and obj_equals leftovers from BarrierSetAssembler
• a8046c9: 8266436: Synthetic constructor trees have non-null return type
• c9873c4: 8260621: (jrtfs) ThreadLocal memory leak in ImageBufferCache when using jrtfs
• 82768d9: 8221503: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/eval/eval001/eval001.java fails with: com.sun.jdi.InvalidTypeException: Can't assign double[][][] to double[][][]
• b71f85a: 8264398: BevelBorderUIResource​(int, Color, Color) and BevelBoder(int, Color, Color) spec should clarify about usage of highlight and shadow color
• ... and 14 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/05e601748a35de02a33721199a00a3d6c335c6d9...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 6ba911d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.