-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8266598: Exception values for AnnotationTypeMismatchException are not always informative #3892
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back winterhalter! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
jddarcy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add 8266598 to the @bug lines of the regression tests.
57ab372 to
9acdb5d
Compare
|
@raphw This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
|
Commenting on PR to avoid closing it, as it is still under review. |
|
Link to CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8266768 |
| /* | ||
| * @test | ||
| * @bug 8228988 | ||
| * @bug 8266598 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| /* | ||
| * @test | ||
| * @bug 8228988 | ||
| * @bug 8266598 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same, here, single line
… always informative
|
Moved the bug number to the same line on both tests. |
jbf
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
/csr |
|
@raphw This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 512 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@jddarcy, @jbf) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
|
@jbf the issue for this pull request, JDK-8266598, already has an approved CSR request: JDK-8266768 |
|
/integrate |
|
/sponsor |
|
@jbf @raphw Since your change was applied there have been 512 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 7b1e402. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This improves the messages that are provided by
AnnotationTypeMismatchExceptions. The message provided by AnnotationTypeMismatchExceptions is deliberately undefined such that this should not break any contract.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3892/head:pull/3892$ git checkout pull/3892Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3892$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3892/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3892View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3892Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3892.diff