-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8267130: Memory Overflow in Disassembler::load_library #4020
Conversation
👋 Welcome back whuang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@Wanghuang-Huawei The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
/contributor add Wang Huang whuang@openjdk.org |
@Wanghuang-Huawei |
@Wanghuang-Huawei |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @Wanghuang-Huawei ,
Long term this coding may benefit by using stringStream, which takes care of truncating (or dynamically allocating) memory as well as string appending.
But for this fix, I think this is mostly fine. See inline remarks.
Cheers, Thomas
// 2. <home>/lib/<vm>/hsdis-<arch>.so | ||
strcpy(&buf[lib_offset], hsdis_library_name); | ||
strcat(&buf[lib_offset], os::dll_file_extension()); | ||
if (jvm_offset + strlen(hsdis_library_name) + strlen(os::dll_file_extension()) < JVM_MAXPATHLEN) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't we need space for the terminating zero here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We use <
here. If we use <=
, we should consider terminating zero ;-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just noting (not requiring you to fix in this CR). The error printing should be converted to use unified logging.
Approved.
@Wanghuang-Huawei This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 243 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@tstuefe, @neliasso, @Hamlin-Li) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
/integrate |
@Wanghuang-Huawei |
/approve |
@Hamlin-Li Unknown command |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good.
/sponser
/sponsor |
@Hamlin-Li @Wanghuang-Huawei Since your change was applied there have been 243 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 083416d. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
put your libjvm.so in a long enough path, such like
strcpy
hsdis_library_name
intobuf
without checking the length.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Contributors
<whuang@openjdk.org>
<mouzhuojun@huawei.com>
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4020/head:pull/4020
$ git checkout pull/4020
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4020
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4020/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4020
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4020
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4020.diff