New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8267370: [Vector API] Fix several crashes after JDK-8256973 #4109
Conversation
👋 Welcome back jiefu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@DamonFool The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
@DamonFool This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 41 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Hi @DamonFool , Thanks much for providing a quick fix. Problem here seems to be related to assert in following assembler routines which made an assumption that the instruction is only supported over AVX2 platforms.
But, its ok to limit the patch to AVX2 considering optimization is majorly aimed at modern server targets (which should supported AVX2). An alternate fix is proposed below which does not restrict the optimization for AVX2 and still keep the changes minimal, since movmaskb is already used at several places in context of 256 bit vector argument.
|
/contributor add @jatin-bhateja |
@DamonFool |
Good catch! @jatin-bhateja More testing is in progress. |
/test |
@DamonFool you need to get approval to run the tests in tier1 for commits up until efc2372 |
The vector tests passed on our Linux/x64 machine. @neliasso , please let me know if you're also fine with the updated change. |
Could someone help to review this fix? I've noticed that JDK-8267519 was also filed about the same crash just now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good.
Thanks @vnkozlov . |
@DamonFool Since your change was applied there have been 41 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 7a63ff7. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
Several vector tests fail with UseAVX=1 after JDK-8256973.
The reason is that
vpmovmskb
[1] can be only used with UseAVX > 1 [2].The fix just disables the intrinsics when UseAVX < 2.
Testing:
Thanks.
Best regards,
Jie
[1] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/c2_MacroAssembler_x86.cpp#L3785
[2] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/assembler_x86.cpp#L4127
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Contributors
<jbhateja@openjdk.org>
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4109/head:pull/4109
$ git checkout pull/4109
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4109
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4109/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4109
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4109
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4109.diff