New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JDK-8267574: Dead code in HtmlStyle/HtmlDocletWriter #4154
JDK-8267574: Dead code in HtmlStyle/HtmlDocletWriter #4154
Conversation
|
@jonathan-gibbons The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, but I found another potential cleanup target close by (see inline comment).
@@ -577,8 +577,7 @@ h1.hidden { | |||
margin-right:10px; | |||
display:inline-block; | |||
} | |||
div.block div.deprecation-comment, div.block div.block span.emphasized-phrase, | |||
div.block div.block span.interface-name { | |||
div.block div.deprecation-comment, div.block div.block span.emphasized-phrase { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A quick search through the code and generated docs suggests that emphasized-phrase
is unused as well. Should this also be removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me investigate a test program to compare the class names in the style sheet and the members of HtmlStyle, and then decide whether to merge that here or do a separate commit/PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test program reveals differences that need to be investigated.
See https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8267709
For now, I've just removed emphasized-phrase
@jonathan-gibbons This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the
|
/integrate |
@jonathan-gibbons Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 594d454. |
Please review a simple
noreg-cleanup
change to remove some dead code.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4154/head:pull/4154
$ git checkout pull/4154
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4154
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4154/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4154
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4154
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4154.diff